aiqbench analysis
This research addresses a critical gap in modeling complex physical systems by establishing theoretical guarantees for identifying drivers within stochastic delayed differential equations. By moving beyond the unproven assumptions of standard causal discovery and physics-informed neural networks, this work offers a more robust framework for learning dynamics that maintain physical consistency. The advancement is significant for fields requiring precise simulation of time-delayed phenomena, such as control theory and fluid dynamics, where reliable model identification is essential.
Identifiability Guarantees for Drivers and Dynamics of Delayed Physical Systems
arXiv:2609.37944v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: A wide range of methods have been proposed, including physics-informed neural networks, which are powerful but do not guarantee identifiability of the dynamics, symbolic regression, which requires a set of precomputed operations, and causal discovery, which is more principled but usually relies on strong assumptions that physical systems may violate. In this work, we develop a theory-grounded method and prove that under a set of permissive assumptions, the structural drivers and drift of stochastic delayed differential equations are identifiable. Our method outperforms others on a benchmark for driver identifiability, and on a second benchmark to evaluate physical consistency of the learned dynamics.
Abstract:A wide range of methods have been proposed, including physics-informed neural networks, which are powerful but do not guarantee identifiability of the dynamics, symbolic regression, which requires a set of precomputed operations, and causal discovery, which is more principled but usually relies on strong assumptions that physical systems may violate. In this work, we develop a theory-grounded method and prove that under a set of permissive assumptions, the structural drivers and drift of stochastic delayed differential equations are identifiable. Our method outperforms others on a benchmark for driver identifiability, and on a second benchmark to evaluate physical consistency of the learned dynamics.
Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Dynamical Systems (math.DS)
arXiv:2609.37944 [stat.ML]
(or arXiv:2609.37944v2 [stat.ML] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.37944 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 200 words
Related coverage

Dharma vs Adharma - The Perplexity of Being Alive
hillpost.in · Aug 25, 2026
How bad would it be if GPS satellites were shot down?
LessWrong · Jun 12, 2026

BRICS Draws a New Global Line: Full Text of New Delhi Declaration
slguardian.org · Sep 12, 2026
Dyna-2: General Purpose Physical Agents with Hour-Long Autonomy — Jason Ma, Dyna Robotics
Latent Space · Oct 13, 2026