aiqbench analysis
This paper establishes a rigorous theoretical framework for in-context learning on partial orders, distinguishing between logical identifiability and structural complexity under open-world assumptions. By proving exact bounds on teaching costs and representation dimensions, it clarifies the fundamental limits of how few-shot prompts can resolve incomparable relationships without violating transitivity or antisymmetry. These findings advance our understanding of the geometric constraints inherent in non-functional relational reasoning within large language models.
Identifiability and Order-Dimension Limits of In-Context Learning on Partial Orders
arXiv:2608.14004v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In-context learning is commonly formalized as inference from examples of a function. Partial orders instead combine transitivity, antisymmetry, and incomparability, so a finite prompt may not determine a queried comparison. We develop a theory of in-context learning on partial orders that separates logical identifiability, prompt teaching cost, structural complexity, and the exact capacity of a formal coordinate-decoder class. A version-space semantics makes background knowledge and open- versus closed-world assumptions explicit. For finite open-world prompts with positive and negative comparisons, we prove an exact completion trichotomy: after taking the reflexive transitive closure of the positive demonstrations, a query is forced true, forced false because every true completion creates a cycle or violates a negative demonstration, or remains genuinely ambiguous. For a known $n$-element universe, we characterize the open-world teaching number as the number of covers plus a blocker-set hitting number, prove that its maximum over all $n$-element posets is $n(n-1)$ and is uniquely attained by the antichain, and identify the blocker term as the exact cost of open-world rather than complete-Hasse semantics. We formalize prompt-dependent $s$-coordinate decoders and use the classical coordinate-order equivalence to obtain an exact representation boundary: dimension at most $s$ is necessary and sufficient, while width at most $s$ is a convenient sufficient condition.
Abstract:In-context learning is commonly formalized as inference from examples of a function. Partial orders instead combine transitivity, antisymmetry, and incomparability, so a finite prompt may not determine a queried comparison. We develop a theory of in-context learning on partial orders that separates logical identifiability, prompt teaching cost, structural complexity, and the exact capacity of a formal coordinate-decoder class. A version-space semantics makes background knowledge and open- versus closed-world assumptions explicit. For finite open-world prompts with positive and negative comparisons, we prove an exact completion trichotomy: after taking the reflexive transitive closure of the positive demonstrations, a query is forced true, forced false because every true completion creates a cycle or violates a negative demonstration, or remains genuinely ambiguous. For a known $n$-element universe, we characterize the open-world teaching number as the number of covers plus a blocker-set hitting number, prove that its maximum over all $n$-element posets is $n(n-1)$ and is uniquely attained by the antichain, and identify the blocker term as the exact cost of open-world rather than complete-Hasse semantics. We formalize prompt-dependent $s$-coordinate decoders and use the classical coordinate-order equivalence to obtain an exact representation boundary: dimension at most $s$ is necessary and sufficient, while width at most $s$ is a convenient sufficient condition.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2608.14004 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2608.14004v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.14004 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 300 words
Related coverage

Why do models task game?
AI Alignment Forum · Aug 6, 2026

GLM-5.3 Sometimes Considers How Train-Time Actions Shape Future Behavior
LessWrong · Oct 15, 2026

Presentation: The Five Stages of AI Maturity in Engineering Organizations - Where and Why Teams Get Stuck
InfoQ · Aug 4, 2026
Relational Quantum Causal Processes: Exact Models, Continuum Limits, and the Boundary of Emergent Gravity
arXiv · Jul 30, 2026