aiqbench analysis
This research introduces ICON decomposition, a novel method for multivariate concept-level explainability that addresses the limitations of existing techniques which often conflate correlated concepts as causal features. By isolating the unique variance each concept contributes after accounting for others, the approach more accurately identifies genuine model dependencies and spurious correlations in tasks like medical imaging. This advancement is critical for improving model auditing and ensuring robustness against shortcut learning in deep neural networks.
ICON Decomposition: Multivariate Concept-Level Explanations of Deep Representations for Model Auditing
arXiv:2608.26083v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deep neural networks often exploit spurious associations in their training data, a failure known as shortcut learning. Concept-based explainability methods screen for shortcuts by testing whether concepts such as a patient's sex or scanner settings can be decoded from a network layer. Because each concept is evaluated in isolation, these methods can mistake correlations between concepts as evidence that the model uses them. We introduce ICON decomposition, which instead quantifies how much of a layer's variance each concept explains after accounting for all other concepts and the outcome. On synthetic data with known ground truth, ICON recovers concept importance more accurately than seven alternative baseline methods. On skin-lesion and brain-imaging models, it isolates the concepts on which a model genuinely relies, quantifies the representation unexplained by any of the supplied concepts, and yields sparse explanations that we validate by retraining and out-of-distribution testing.
Abstract:Deep neural networks often exploit spurious associations in their training data, a failure known as shortcut learning. Concept-based explainability methods screen for shortcuts by testing whether concepts such as a patient's sex or scanner settings can be decoded from a network layer. Because each concept is evaluated in isolation, these methods can mistake correlations between concepts as evidence that the model uses them. We introduce ICON decomposition, which instead quantifies how much of a layer's variance each concept explains after accounting for all other concepts and the outcome. On synthetic data with known ground truth, ICON recovers concept importance more accurately than seven alternative baseline methods. On skin-lesion and brain-imaging models, it isolates the concepts on which a model genuinely relies, quantifies the representation unexplained by any of the supplied concepts, and yields sparse explanations that we validate by retraining and out-of-distribution testing.
44 pages, 12 figures, 3 tables. Includes Extended Data (7 figures, 2 tables). Code: this https URL
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
I.2.6; I.2.10; I.5.1; J.3
arXiv:2608.26083 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2608.26083v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.26083 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 270 words
Related coverage

Deconfusing Corrigibility
AI Alignment Forum · Oct 17, 2026

Reflections on unlearning and inoculation
LessWrong · Sep 20, 2026

Drivers predict self-driving car actions better with AI insights
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 2, 2026

PIRAMID: Progress and Plans
LessWrong · Jul 27, 2026