Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

HybridProver advances automated theorem proving by unifying whole-proof synthesis with tactic-based generation using proof sketches as an intermediate representation. By post-training lightweight 7B-scale LLMs on optimized Isabelle datasets, the framework achieves a 73.8% success rate on the miniF2F benchmark, surpassing prior state-of-the-art results without requiring massive model sizes. This approach demonstrates that combining high-level planning with fine-grained reasoning can effectively automate rigorous mathematical verification for critical systems.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

HybridProver: Augmenting Theorem Proving with LLM-Driven Proof Synthesis and Refinement

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2505.15740v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Formal methods play a crucial role in ensuring the reliability of critical systems through rigorous mathematical verification. However, their adoption remains limited due to the labor-intensive nature of manual proof construction. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have opened new opportunities for automated theorem proving. Two main paradigms have emerged: stepwise tactic-based generation and whole-proof synthesis. While both approaches have complementary strengths, existing work largely treats them in isolation. In this work, we propose HybridProver, a unified framework that integrates whole-proof synthesis and tactic-based generation through proof sketches as an intermediate representation. This design enables the reuse of partially correct proof structures while effectively combining high-level planning with fine-grained reasoning. We implement HybridProver in Isabelle/HOL and post-train two 7B-scale LLMs on our optimized Isabelle datasets. Experiments on the miniF2F Isabelle benchmark achieved a 73.8% success rate and improved upon the previous state of the art (61.9%), demonstrating that lightweight models, when combined with our approach, can effectively generate Isabelle/HOL proofs without relying on very large LLMs. Ablation studies further analyze the impact of dataset quality, training configurations, and sampling strategies on proof generation.

Abstract:Formal methods play a crucial role in ensuring the reliability of critical systems through rigorous mathematical verification. However, their adoption remains limited due to the labor-intensive nature of manual proof construction. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have opened new opportunities for automated theorem proving. Two main paradigms have emerged: stepwise tactic-based generation and whole-proof synthesis. While both approaches have complementary strengths, existing work largely treats them in isolation. In this work, we propose HybridProver, a unified framework that integrates whole-proof synthesis and tactic-based generation through proof sketches as an intermediate representation. This design enables the reuse of partially correct proof structures while effectively combining high-level planning with fine-grained reasoning. We implement HybridProver in Isabelle/HOL and post-train two 7B-scale LLMs on our optimized Isabelle datasets. Experiments on the miniF2F Isabelle benchmark achieved a 73.8% success rate and improved upon the previous state of the art (61.9%), demonstrating that lightweight models, when combined with our approach, can effectively generate Isabelle/HOL proofs without relying on very large LLMs. Ablation studies further analyze the impact of dataset quality, training configurations, and sampling strategies on proof generation.

Formal Languages and Automata Theory (cs.FL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Software Engineering (cs.SE)

arXiv:2505.15740 [cs.FL]

(or arXiv:2505.15740v2 [cs.FL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.15740 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 285 words

Related coverage