aiqbench analysis
This paper advances the theoretical foundations of machine learning by improving the oracle complexity bounds for constrained min-max optimization and variational inequalities from $\widetilde{O}(\varepsilon^{-4})$ to near-optimal $\widetilde{O}(\varepsilon^{-2})$. By bridging the gap between unconstrained and constrained settings, these results offer more efficient convergence guarantees for adversarial training and generative modeling tasks where gradient mapping is the standard optimality metric.
How to Make the Gradient Mapping Small for Constrained Stochastic Min-Max Problems and Beyond
arXiv:2609.08380v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study the stochastic first-order oracle complexity for constrained or regularized convex-concave min-max optimization and stochastic monotone variational inequalities. We focus on the case when suboptimality is measured in terms of the gradient mapping, also known as, forward-backward or natural residual, an optimality notion that generalizes the gradient norm for unconstrained problems. In this setting, under standard unbiased oracle access with now-standard variance assumptions, the best-known complexity for making the norm of the gradient mapping less than $\varepsilon$ is $\widetilde{O}(\varepsilon^{-4})$, compared to the near-optimal $\widetilde{O}(\varepsilon^{-2})$ that is established in the unconstrained case. We bridge this gap to improve the gradient mapping complexity for constrained convex-concave min-max problems to $\widetilde{O}(\varepsilon^{-2})$. We then extend to prove the same complexity for problems without the bounded variance, by using the Blum-Gladyshev assumption.
Abstract:We study the stochastic first-order oracle complexity for constrained or regularized convex-concave min-max optimization and stochastic monotone variational inequalities. We focus on the case when suboptimality is measured in terms of the gradient mapping, also known as, forward-backward or natural residual, an optimality notion that generalizes the gradient norm for unconstrained problems. In this setting, under standard unbiased oracle access with now-standard variance assumptions, the best-known complexity for making the norm of the gradient mapping less than $\varepsilon$ is $\widetilde{O}(\varepsilon^{-4})$, compared to the near-optimal $\widetilde{O}(\varepsilon^{-2})$ that is established in the unconstrained case. We bridge this gap to improve the gradient mapping complexity for constrained convex-concave min-max problems to $\widetilde{O}(\varepsilon^{-2})$. We then extend to prove the same complexity for problems without the bounded variance, by using the Blum-Gladyshev assumption.
Optimization and Control (math.OC); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.08380 [math.OC]
(or arXiv:2609.08380v1 [math.OC] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.08380 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 226 words
Related coverage
Synthesis Superintelligence: from Semiconductors to Superconductors — Periodic Labs’ Liam Fedus and Ekin Dogus Cubuk
Latent Space · Oct 8, 2026

Challenge: Hand coding weights for efficient sequence memorisation
AI Alignment Forum · Jul 23, 2026
J++ Lens: Jacobian Filtering Enables More Faithful Workspace Lenses
LessWrong · Oct 8, 2026
Running Variational Quantum Eigensolver with Qiskit Aer on AMD Instinct
AMD · May 29, 2026