Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces AMSC, a method for lifelong reinforcement learning that leverages task similarity via Wasserstein embeddings to dynamically select and weight prior policies without catastrophic forgetting. By treating knowledge reuse as an adaptive composition problem rather than simple retention, the approach demonstrates superior forward transfer on standard benchmarks like CT-graph and MiniGrid. The findings highlight that effective continual adaptation hinges on accurately identifying relevant historical sources and tuning their layer-specific contribution weights.
Sources coveringarXiv, AI Alignment Forum, Quantum Zeitgeist, Hugging Face
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

How to Find and Reuse Policies for Continuous Adaptation in Lifelong Reinforcement Learning

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2610.03119v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In lifelong reinforcement learning, retaining previously learned policies is not sufficient for effective transfer to a new task. Useful knowledge may be distributed across several prior policies, and its relevance may change as the learner acquires experience. One hypothesis is that task similarity can be effectively used in a continual learning setting to find and combine previously learned policies. To test it, Adaptive Mask Selection and Composition (AMSC) is designed to estimate similarity from online experience via non-parametric Wasserstein task embeddings from state-action-reward samples. The z-score-normalized sparsemax of the similarity scores are used to derive a variable-size support to periodically choose and weight policies to form a prior when learning a new task. On CT-graph and MiniGrid, AMSC achieves higher mean performance and forward transfer than the evaluated modular composition baselines while exhibiting no forgetting. Results on Continual World suggest that identifying relevant prior knowledge and determining its layer-specific composition may require additional layer-specific tuning. Ablations show that selecting relevant sources and determining how strongly to reuse them are central to these gains. Independently measured pairwise transfer is also positively associated with task-embedding similarity. These results indicate that task similarity can be an effective criterion to select and weight specific knowledge for reuse in lifelong reinforcement learning.

Abstract:In lifelong reinforcement learning, retaining previously learned policies is not sufficient for effective transfer to a new task. Useful knowledge may be distributed across several prior policies, and its relevance may change as the learner acquires experience. One hypothesis is that task similarity can be effectively used in a continual learning setting to find and combine previously learned policies. To test it, Adaptive Mask Selection and Composition (AMSC) is designed to estimate similarity from online experience via non-parametric Wasserstein task embeddings from state-action-reward samples. The z-score-normalized sparsemax of the similarity scores are used to derive a variable-size support to periodically choose and weight policies to form a prior when learning a new task. On CT-graph and MiniGrid, AMSC achieves higher mean performance and forward transfer than the evaluated modular composition baselines while exhibiting no forgetting. Results on Continual World suggest that identifying relevant prior knowledge and determining its layer-specific composition may require additional layer-specific tuning. Ablations show that selecting relevant sources and determining how strongly to reuse them are central to these gains. Independently measured pairwise transfer is also positively associated with task-embedding similarity. These results indicate that task similarity can be an effective criterion to select and weight specific knowledge for reuse in lifelong reinforcement learning.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Robotics (cs.RO)

arXiv:2610.03119 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.03119v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.03119 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 306 words

Related coverage