aiqbench analysis
This research presents a breakthrough in classical verification of quantum computation by enabling the validation of QMA languages using a single, undisturbed witness state. The protocol relies on post-quantum Learning With Errors assumptions and introduces novel witness-preserving arguments for NP that maintain superposition integrity during verification. This advancement addresses critical limitations in existing CVQC protocols that previously required destructive duplication of quantum witnesses.
How to Classically Verify a Quantum Cat without Killing It
arXiv:2602.09282v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: A quantum verifier decides membership in QMA using a (single) quantum witness state. This witness may be arbitrary, and no requirement is placed on it beyond its acceptance probability. A protocol claiming to classically verify QMA should offer the same guarantee: any witness that would convince a quantum verifier should also suffice to convince a classical verifier. Unfortunately, existing classical verification of quantum computation (CVQC) protocols behave quite differently from the original QMA verifier: they require many copies of the witness and destroy every one, effectively demanding that the prover solve the hard problem of witness duplication before verification can begin. We build a protocol to classically verify QMA languages that uses a single copy of the prover's QMA witness. Whenever the original QMA verifier accepts that witness with overwhelming probability, our protocol has negligible completeness and soundness errors and returns the witness negligibly disturbed after interaction with an honest verifier. The soundness of our CVQC is based on the post-quantum Learning With Errors (LWE) assumption. As an intermediate step of independent interest, we introduce witness-preserving classical arguments for NP which enable provers that start out with a superposition over NP witnesses to convince a verifier without disturbing their superposition.
Abstract:A quantum verifier decides membership in QMA using a (single) quantum witness state. This witness may be arbitrary, and no requirement is placed on it beyond its acceptance probability. A protocol claiming to classically verify QMA should offer the same guarantee: any witness that would convince a quantum verifier should also suffice to convince a classical verifier. Unfortunately, existing classical verification of quantum computation (CVQC) protocols behave quite differently from the original QMA verifier: they require many copies of the witness and destroy every one, effectively demanding that the prover solve the hard problem of witness duplication before verification can begin. We build a protocol to classically verify QMA languages that uses a single copy of the prover's QMA witness. Whenever the original QMA verifier accepts that witness with overwhelming probability, our protocol has negligible completeness and soundness errors and returns the witness negligibly disturbed after interaction with an honest verifier. The soundness of our CVQC is based on the post-quantum Learning With Errors (LWE) assumption. As an intermediate step of independent interest, we introduce witness-preserving classical arguments for NP which enable provers that start out with a superposition over NP witnesses to convince a verifier without disturbing their superposition.
Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
arXiv:2602.09282 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2602.09282v2 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.09282 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 296 words
Related coverage

AI and Quantum Computing Briefing
livetradingnews.com · Aug 4, 2026
News Archive 2026
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026
Latest Articles
freerepublic.com · Aug 2, 2026

What is Quantum Error Correction? Complete 2026 Beginner’s Guide
Quantum Zeitgeist · May 29, 2026