aiqbench analysis
This research investigates how neural representations become specialized for specific targets within minimal artificial learners, revealing that latent susceptibility to bias depends heavily on optimizer dynamics like Adam's second-moment scaling. The study demonstrates that while equalizing loss weights can reduce specialization differences, the coordinate-wise patterns of these moments and update sequences critically determine which representations remain more robust or vulnerable to opposing interventions. These findings offer crucial insights into the stability and generalization limits of deep learning models when faced with selective data acquisition.
How Shared Representations Become Specialized: Formation, Maintenance, and Latent Susceptibility
arXiv:2610.15830v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When several predictions use the same internal representation, information about some targets can remain easier to recover than information about others. We study how this specialization forms, persists, and changes in minimal artificial learners. With reconstruction errors weighted equally during learning, changing which target is observed precisely selects the favored target and redirects an already specialized learner. Removing current support can reduce a formed bias, whereas state-following update feedback can maintain it. We then compare learners formed through different observation and update conditions but matched on specified reconstruction measurements. Both change under the same brief opposing intervention, yet their responses differ. Resetting Adam largely removes the ten-update difference; exchanging its second moment reverses which route is more susceptible. New interventions show that equalizing the mean second-moment scaling reduces but does not remove the difference: its coordinate-wise pattern also matters. With fresh Adam or calibrated SGD, smaller route differences emerge later, whereas 500 common opposing updates bring the selected allocation endpoints close. A further control produces response differences with identical acquisition and equal mean loss weights but jointly different weight variability and realized sequence. Acquisition-selected formation also extends to a symmetric three-target setting. These interventions distinguish specialization's formation, present support, and time-dependent latent susceptibility.
Abstract:When several predictions use the same internal representation, information about some targets can remain easier to recover than information about others. We study how this specialization forms, persists, and changes in minimal artificial learners. With reconstruction errors weighted equally during learning, changing which target is observed precisely selects the favored target and redirects an already specialized learner. Removing current support can reduce a formed bias, whereas state-following update feedback can maintain it. We then compare learners formed through different observation and update conditions but matched on specified reconstruction measurements. Both change under the same brief opposing intervention, yet their responses differ. Resetting Adam largely removes the ten-update difference; exchanging its second moment reverses which route is more susceptible. New interventions show that equalizing the mean second-moment scaling reduces but does not remove the difference: its coordinate-wise pattern also matters. With fresh Adam or calibrated SGD, smaller route differences emerge later, whereas 500 common opposing updates bring the selected allocation endpoints close. A further control produces response differences with identical acquisition and equal mean loss weights but jointly different weight variability and realized sequence. Acquisition-selected formation also extends to a symmetric three-target setting. These interventions distinguish specialization's formation, present support, and time-dependent latent susceptibility.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Neural and Evolutionary Computing (cs.NE)
arXiv:2610.15830 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.15830v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.15830 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 302 words
Related coverage

PIRAMID: Progress and Plans
LessWrong · Jul 27, 2026

[AINews] Here are 6 Clones of Jev in 2 days
Latent Space · Sep 19, 2026
The Continual Constitutional Convention: How language models revise the documents that govern them
AI Alignment Forum · Oct 13, 2026

BRICS Draws a New Global Line: Full Text of New Delhi Declaration
slguardian.org · Sep 12, 2026