Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Safety

aiqbench analysis

This research investigates how input perturbations propagate through large language models by analyzing output behavior, hidden-state geometry, and attention-head functions across multiple checkpoints. The study reveals that relying on single-metric robustness evaluations is misleading, as different perturbation types generate distinct metric profiles that are only partially consistent across model versions. These findings underscore the necessity for multi-level evaluation frameworks to accurately assess how adversarial or naturalistic noise alters internal language-model computations.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

How Perturbations Propagate: A Multi-Level Analysis of Robustness in Large Language Models

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.03322v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language models encounter typos, corrupted text, altered words, and disrupted token order, yet robustness is usually evaluated only through output behavior. We study how six naturalistic and synthetic input perturbations propagate through decoder-only language models at three levels: output behavior, hidden-state geometry, and attention-head function. We evaluate behavioral effects across four GPT-2 and two Qwen2.5 checkpoints by analyzing layerwise geometry using centered kernel alignment and intrinsic dimension, and examine attention-head responses in GPT-2. Perturbation types produce distinguishable metric profiles that are not fully captured by output measures and are only partly consistent across the tested checkpoints. Copying scores are especially associated with activation-patching recovery under token substitution and shuffling. Gradient-guided HotFlip perturbations also cause stronger behavioral and representational disruption than rate-matched random token substitutions in GPT-2; their behavioral effects are consistent across all six tested checkpoints. Our results show that robustness claims based on a single behavioral or representational metric can be misleading, and motivate multi-level evaluation of how perturbations alter language-model computation.

Abstract:Language models encounter typos, corrupted text, altered words, and disrupted token order, yet robustness is usually evaluated only through output behavior. We study how six naturalistic and synthetic input perturbations propagate through decoder-only language models at three levels: output behavior, hidden-state geometry, and attention-head function. We evaluate behavioral effects across four GPT-2 and two Qwen2.5 checkpoints by analyzing layerwise geometry using centered kernel alignment and intrinsic dimension, and examine attention-head responses in GPT-2. Perturbation types produce distinguishable metric profiles that are not fully captured by output measures and are only partly consistent across the tested checkpoints. Copying scores are especially associated with activation-patching recovery under token substitution and shuffling. Gradient-guided HotFlip perturbations also cause stronger behavioral and representational disruption than rate-matched random token substitutions in GPT-2; their behavioral effects are consistent across all six tested checkpoints. Our results show that robustness claims based on a single behavioral or representational metric can be misleading, and motivate multi-level evaluation of how perturbations alter language-model computation.

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (stat.ML)

arXiv:2609.03322 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2609.03322v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.03322 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 261 words

Related coverage