Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research addresses the computational inefficiency inherent in visual world models by introducing SufficientPlan, a framework that dynamically certifies reduced planning budgets without altering pretrained architectures. By reusing static context and leveraging closed-loop evidence, the method significantly lowers search latency while maintaining competitive performance across diverse robotic control tasks. This advancement is critical for deploying scalable, real-time AI agents where computational resources are constrained.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

How Much Planning Is Enough? Reducing Search and Computation in World-Model Planning

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.08350v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Visual world models enable goal-directed control through decision-time action search, but their deployment efficiency is often limited by conservatively large planning budgets. We show that competitive task performance can be achieved without agreement with the Full-budget action, that sufficient budgets vary across model--task pairs, and that iterative planners repeatedly encode solve-invariant context. To address these inefficiencies, we propose {SufficientPlan}, a simple deployment framework that requires no modification to pretrained world models or planner updates. Its {Paired Sequential Budget Certification (PSBC)} component uses paired closed-loop evidence to search for and certify a reduced model--task-specific budget within a predefined Full-performance tolerance. Its {Static-Context Reuse (SCR)} component caches observation and goal representations across search iterations while preserving candidate-dependent planning and selected actions. Experiments across multiple world-model backbones and visual-control tasks show that SufficientPlan substantially reduces search budgets and planning latency while maintaining competitive control performance.

Title:How Much Planning Is Enough? Reducing Search and Computation in World-Model Planning

Abstract:Visual world models enable goal-directed control through decision-time action search, but their deployment efficiency is often limited by conservatively large planning budgets. We show that competitive task performance can be achieved without agreement with the Full-budget action, that sufficient budgets vary across model--task pairs, and that iterative planners repeatedly encode solve-invariant context. To address these inefficiencies, we propose {SufficientPlan}, a simple deployment framework that requires no modification to pretrained world models or planner updates. Its {Paired Sequential Budget Certification (PSBC)} component uses paired closed-loop evidence to search for and certify a reduced model--task-specific budget within a predefined Full-performance tolerance. Its {Static-Context Reuse (SCR)} component caches observation and goal representations across search iterations while preserving candidate-dependent planning and selected actions. Experiments across multiple world-model backbones and visual-control tasks show that SufficientPlan substantially reduces search budgets and planning latency while maintaining competitive control performance.

Robotics (cs.RO); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2610.08350 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2610.08350v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.08350 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 250 words

Related coverage