aiqbench analysis
This paper establishes sharp minimax bounds for determining causal direction in bivariate linear models, quantifying sample complexity based on edge strength and non-Gaussianity. Notably, the core proof was generated by an advanced AI model (GPT-5.6 Sol), marking a significant step toward autonomous mathematical discovery within machine learning research. This work advances foundational understanding of identifiability conditions essential for robust causal inference algorithms.
How Many Samples Are Needed to Determine Causal Direction? Sharp Minimax Bounds for Bivariate LiNGAM
arXiv:2608.15840v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study how many observations are needed to determine the causal direction between two linearly related variables. Classical LiNGAM theory shows that independent non-Gaussian disturbances identify the direction, but does not quantify the difficulty when the causal effect is weak or the disturbances are nearly Gaussian. Let $\beta$ bound the absolute structural coefficient from below, let $\nu$ measure each standardized disturbance's distance from Gaussianity, and let the disturbance scales lie in $[\underline\sigma,\overline\sigma]$. We prove the sharp local minimax law \[ N_2^\star(\beta,\nu,\delta) \asymp \frac{\log(1/\delta)} {d_\beta^2+\beta^2\nu^2}, \qquad d_\beta= \left[\beta^2- \left(1-\frac{\underline\sigma^2}{\overline\sigma^2}\right)\right]_+. \] Previous theory established population identifiability or assumed a fixed separation between the two directions. By contrast, we establish the sharp sample complexity as a joint function of edge strength, distance from Gaussianity, and scale uncertainty, and characterize when identification comes from non-Gaussian dependence or from covariance alone. The proof was independently generated with GPT-5.6 Sol in Codex's Ultra mode during a two-hour session. The human author supplied the prompt and was responsible only forchecking the proof and revising and polishing the manuscript.
Title:How Many Samples Are Needed to Determine Causal Direction? Sharp Minimax Bounds for Bivariate LiNGAM
Abstract:We study how many observations are needed to determine the causal direction between two linearly related variables. Classical LiNGAM theory shows that independent non-Gaussian disturbances identify the direction, but does not quantify the difficulty when the causal effect is weak or the disturbances are nearly Gaussian. Let $\beta$ bound the absolute structural coefficient from below, let $\nu$ measure each standardized disturbance's distance from Gaussianity, and let the disturbance scales lie in $[\underline\sigma,\overline\sigma]$. We prove the sharp local minimax law \[ N_2^\star(\beta,\nu,\delta) \asymp \frac{\log(1/\delta)} {d_\beta^2+\beta^2\nu^2}, \qquad d_\beta= \left[\beta^2- \left(1-\frac{\underline\sigma^2}{\overline\sigma^2}\right)\right]_+. \] Previous theory established population identifiability or assumed a fixed separation between the two directions. By contrast, we establish the sharp sample complexity as a joint function of edge strength, distance from Gaussianity, and scale uncertainty, and characterize when identification comes from non-Gaussian dependence or from covariance alone. The proof was independently generated with GPT-5.6 Sol in Codex's Ultra mode during a two-hour session. The human author supplied the prompt and was responsible only forchecking the proof and revising and polishing the manuscript.
Statistics Theory (math.ST); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Econometrics (econ.EM); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
arXiv:2608.15840 [math.ST]
(or arXiv:2608.15840v1 [math.ST] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.15840 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 288 words
Related coverage

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Oct 3, 2026
Open Distillation of Hereditary Traits
AI Alignment Forum · Jul 14, 2026

Brief independent investigation of agents’ behavior, reasoning and collaboration in the OpenAI / Hugging Face hacking incident
METR · Aug 26, 2026

PIRAMID: Progress and Plans
LessWrong · Jul 27, 2026