How many labelers do you have? A closer look at gold-standard labels

Title:How many labelers do you have? A closer look at gold-standard labels

Abstract:The construction of most supervised learning datasets revolves around collecting multiple labels for each instance, then aggregating the labels to form a type of "true" label. We question the wisdom of this pipeline by developing a (stylized) theoretical model of this process and analyzing its statistical consequences, showing how access to non-aggregated label information can make training well-calibrated models more feasible than it is with cleaned labels. The entire story, however, is subtle, and the contrasts between aggregated and fuller label information depend on the particulars of the problem, where estimators that use aggregated information exhibit robust but slower rates of convergence, while estimators that can effectively leverage all labels converge more quickly if they have fidelity to (or can learn) the true labeling process. The theory makes several predictions for real-world datasets, including when non-aggregate labels should improve learning performance, which we test to corroborate the validity of our predictions.

64 pages, 8 figures. Accepted to Journal of the American Statistical Association (JASA) for publication

Statistics Theory (math.ST); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2206.12041 [math.ST]

(or arXiv:2206.12041v3 [math.ST] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2206.12041 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.