aiqbench analysis
This study investigates how formerly incarcerated individuals envision AI tools not as surveillance mechanisms, but as resources for strategic agency within the parole process. The research highlights a critical gap in current correctional technology design, arguing that systems must be reframed to support human-centered navigation of carceral power structures rather than merely documenting transformation. By centering the voices of justice-impacted people, the paper challenges dominant assumptions about algorithmic objectivity and proposes new directions for ethical AI deployment in social welfare contexts.
How Formerly Incarcerated People Envision Technologies for Prison Parole
arXiv:2607.16513v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI-driven algorithms and automated tools are increasingly embedded in the correctional landscape, shaping parole eligibility,release decisions, and surveillance. These tools are also often framed as objective, inevitable solutions to inefficiency andbias. Yet, these computational systems are rarely designed with input from justice-impacted individuals, which means theymight fail to address the real needs of incarcerated people. To address this gap, we surveyed 31 formerly incarcerated peopleabout their parole experiences and their visions for technologies that could support parole preparation. Contrary to dominantassumptions, participants did not imagine computational tools as instruments to dismantle the prison system, but as resourcesfor navigating power: translating complex parole concepts into culturally familiar terms, documenting personal transformationin board-legible ways, and recognizing the often-invisible labor of families. We argue that these imaginaries point towardtechnologies designed for strategic agency, where tools help incarcerated individuals and their families build the capacity tonavigate existing power structures in pursuit of freedom. We conclude by reframing computational tools for parole awayfrom surveillance and toward human-centered systems that support people in navigating carceral power structures.
Abstract:AI-driven algorithms and automated tools are increasingly embedded in the correctional landscape, shaping parole eligibility,release decisions, and surveillance. These tools are also often framed as objective, inevitable solutions to inefficiency andbias. Yet, these computational systems are rarely designed with input from justice-impacted individuals, which means theymight fail to address the real needs of incarcerated people. To address this gap, we surveyed 31 formerly incarcerated peopleabout their parole experiences and their visions for technologies that could support parole preparation. Contrary to dominantassumptions, participants did not imagine computational tools as instruments to dismantle the prison system, but as resourcesfor navigating power: translating complex parole concepts into culturally familiar terms, documenting personal transformationin board-legible ways, and recognizing the often-invisible labor of families. We argue that these imaginaries point towardtechnologies designed for strategic agency, where tools help incarcerated individuals and their families build the capacity tonavigate existing power structures in pursuit of freedom. We conclude by reframing computational tools for parole awayfrom surveillance and toward human-centered systems that support people in navigating carceral power structures.
25 pages, 1 figure. To appear in Proceedings of the 2026 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT '26)
Computers and Society (cs.CY); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)
K.4.1; H.5.2; I.2.0
arXiv:2607.16513 [cs.CY]
(or arXiv:2607.16513v1 [cs.CY] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.16513 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
https://doi.org/10.1145/3805689.3812258 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 305 words
Related coverage

ICE detainees in Georgia used the facility’s video calling software to expose the conditions inside
The Verge · Oct 8, 2026

Does AI need an antitrust exemption so it doesn’t kill everyone????
The Verge · Sep 19, 2026

The People of Utah vs. Kevin O’Leary
The Verge · Oct 1, 2026

Little Venice, Little Sparta: The UAE Statecraft Meets The War On Iran - Analysis
eurasiareview.com · Sep 24, 2026