Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research investigates the generalizability of persona effects in language models, revealing that while these behavioral patterns are predictable across attributes, they lack portability between different model checkpoints. The study demonstrates that target-specific refitting consistently outperforms strategies attempting to borrow gains from other models, with regularized updates emerging as the most robust approach for prompt transfers. These findings provide critical insights into the limits of parameter efficiency and transfer learning when fine-tuning open-weight models like OLMo-3 and Qwen2.5 for specific persona tasks.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

How Far Do Persona Effects Generalize in Language Models?

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2609.32758v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Persona prompts ask language models to answer as particular kinds of people. We test whether relationships learned from these effects predict responses to new questions and remain useful across models and prompts. Across 57 attributes, three behavioral domains, and seven pairs of open 7 to 9B checkpoints, persona effects can be predictable without being portable. Separate attribute and task gains improve prediction beyond shared scaling significantly in OLMo-3 and Qwen2.5, with the most robust evidence in OLMo-3. In that model, target refitting significantly outperforms gains borrowed from each of the other six pairs. Across model transfers, borrowed gains with one amplitude underperform shared scaling in most directions; allowing two target parameters removes the significant losses but yields no significant benefit over target shared scaling. After rewording, refitting significantly outperforms reuse with one amplitude in all six tested pairs, while changes of examples or country context often preserve reuse value. In the tested prompt transfers, regularized updates outperform both reuse strategies in median at 64 target questions per attribute. A separate survey comparison finds that selecting the more responsive checkpoint can worsen human fit; responsiveness is confounded with training status, and temperature calibration largely removes this cost but not errors in group ordering. Within the tested gain representation, apparent transfer can come from target calibration; source relationships must add predictive value beyond calibration and regularization. Code and data are available at https://github.com/thzva/persona-gain

Title:How Far Do Persona Effects Generalize in Language Models?

Abstract:Persona prompts ask language models to answer as particular kinds of people. We test whether relationships learned from these effects predict responses to new questions and remain useful across models and prompts. Across 57 attributes, three behavioral domains, and seven pairs of open 7 to 9B checkpoints, persona effects can be predictable without being portable. Separate attribute and task gains improve prediction beyond shared scaling significantly in OLMo-3 and Qwen2.5, with the most robust evidence in OLMo-3. In that model, target refitting significantly outperforms gains borrowed from each of the other six pairs. Across model transfers, borrowed gains with one amplitude underperform shared scaling in most directions; allowing two target parameters removes the significant losses but yields no significant benefit over target shared scaling. After rewording, refitting significantly outperforms reuse with one amplitude in all six tested pairs, while changes of examples or country context often preserve reuse value. In the tested prompt transfers, regularized updates outperform both reuse strategies in median at 64 target questions per attribute. A separate survey comparison finds that selecting the more responsive checkpoint can worsen human fit; responsiveness is confounded with training status, and temperature calibration largely removes this cost but not errors in group ordering. Within the tested gain representation, apparent transfer can come from target calibration; source relationships must add predictive value beyond calibration and regularization. Code and data are available at this https URL

42 pages, 11 figures, 41 tables. Code and data: this https URL

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2609.32758 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2609.32758v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.32758 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 352 words

Related coverage