aiqbench analysis
This paper identifies the Edge of Stability as the primary cause for SCAFFOLD's practical underperformance compared to FedAvg in federated learning, revealing that high sharpness degrades gradient estimation accuracy. The findings offer a critical diagnostic for optimizing heterogeneous data scenarios where theoretical guarantees often fail to translate into real-world efficiency. By linking optimization dynamics directly to algorithmic reliability, the work provides actionable insights for improving deep learning convergence in distributed settings.
How Edge of Stability Hinders SCAFFOLD in Federated Optimization
arXiv:2608.25873v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In federated learning, it is well known that heterogeneous data can (in theory) slow down optimization, and much effort has been directed at designing optimization algorithms that are unaffected by data heterogeneity, such as the SCAFFOLD algorithm. Yet, despite strong theoretical guarantees, SCAFFOLD does not usually outperform the much simpler FedAvg in practice. In this work, we propose that this gap is due to the presence of Edge of Stability (EoS) and progressive sharpening in federated optimization, supported by extensive empirical probing. First, we find that EoS-like dynamics occur with both FedAvg and SCAFFOLD under a variety of architectures and hyperparameters. We observe that the equilibrium value of the sharpness is inversely proportional to the learning rate (as in GD), and interestingly, the degree of data heterogeneity (but not the number of local steps) also affects the equilibrium value. Most importantly, we observe that SCAFFOLD's ability to estimate the gradient of the global objective is severely degraded at the EoS, as measured by the correlation between sharpness and SCAFFOLD's error in estimating the global gradient along the optimization trajectory. This suggests a mechanism for SCAFFOLD's lackluster performance in deep learning: with high sharpness at the EoS, SCAFFOLD cannot reliably estimate the global gradient.
Abstract:In federated learning, it is well known that heterogeneous data can (in theory) slow down optimization, and much effort has been directed at designing optimization algorithms that are unaffected by data heterogeneity, such as the SCAFFOLD algorithm. Yet, despite strong theoretical guarantees, SCAFFOLD does not usually outperform the much simpler FedAvg in practice. In this work, we propose that this gap is due to the presence of Edge of Stability (EoS) and progressive sharpening in federated optimization, supported by extensive empirical probing. First, we find that EoS-like dynamics occur with both FedAvg and SCAFFOLD under a variety of architectures and hyperparameters. We observe that the equilibrium value of the sharpness is inversely proportional to the learning rate (as in GD), and interestingly, the degree of data heterogeneity (but not the number of local steps) also affects the equilibrium value. Most importantly, we observe that SCAFFOLD's ability to estimate the gradient of the global objective is severely degraded at the EoS, as measured by the correlation between sharpness and SCAFFOLD's error in estimating the global gradient along the optimization trajectory. This suggests a mechanism for SCAFFOLD's lackluster performance in deep learning: with high sharpness at the EoS, SCAFFOLD cannot reliably estimate the global gradient.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2608.25873 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2608.25873v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.25873 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 297 words
