Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This study investigates the causal mechanisms behind how large language models resolve conflicts between external context and internal parametric knowledge. By manipulating activation directions in Qwen, Llama, and OLMo architectures, researchers find that steering vectors are largely task-specific rather than universally reusable across different scenarios. These findings clarify the boundaries of model interpretability and suggest that authority representations are deeply dependent on the specific computational context of each task.
Sources coveringarXiv, AI Alignment Forum, Analytics Vidhya, Quantum Frontiers
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

How Do Language Models Choose Between Context and Memory?

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.00753v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When contextual information conflicts with the knowledge stored in model parameters, activation directions can be used to decode and steer which source the model follows. However, steering along a direction does not establish causality: whether the unedited model would naturally use that direction or whether the direction is reusable across tasks. We test these distinctions through counterfactual experiments in unambiguous settings. First, we estimate authority directions from agreement prompts, in which the context and parametric knowledge support the same answer. We then interchange naturally occurring coordinates along these directions between matched prompts that direct the model to prioritize either the supplied context or its parametric knowledge. Across Qwen, Llama, and OLMo models, this intervention reproduces 30-68% of the authority-induced shift in source choice, whereas matched controls reproduce almost none. To test cross-task reuse, we learn authority directions on two tasks separately and see that cross-task transferability closes only 9% of the authority gap while the local direction learned on the given task closes 57%. These results distinguish authority representation, causal use, and cross-task causal reuse, and suggest that authority computations may be task-dependent, rather than reusable across tasks.

Title:How Do Language Models Choose Between Context and Memory?

Abstract:When contextual information conflicts with the knowledge stored in model parameters, activation directions can be used to decode and steer which source the model follows. However, steering along a direction does not establish causality: whether the unedited model would naturally use that direction or whether the direction is reusable across tasks. We test these distinctions through counterfactual experiments in unambiguous settings. First, we estimate authority directions from agreement prompts, in which the context and parametric knowledge support the same answer. We then interchange naturally occurring coordinates along these directions between matched prompts that direct the model to prioritize either the supplied context or its parametric knowledge. Across Qwen, Llama, and OLMo models, this intervention reproduces 30-68% of the authority-induced shift in source choice, whereas matched controls reproduce almost none. To test cross-task reuse, we learn authority directions on two tasks separately and see that cross-task transferability closes only 9% of the authority gap while the local direction learned on the given task closes 57%. These results distinguish authority representation, causal use, and cross-task causal reuse, and suggest that authority computations may be task-dependent, rather than reusable across tasks.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2609.00753 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2609.00753v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.00753 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 295 words

Related coverage