Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces ProSA, a novel auditing framework that exposes "Footprint Bias" in Document Layout Analysis pipelines by shifting evaluation from simple area-centric metrics to structure-aware vulnerability diagnosis. The study demonstrates that structural identity loss correlates far more strongly with downstream retrieval and QA failures than traditional OCR instability measures, offering a critical new lens for assessing robustness in document intelligence systems.
Sources coveringarXiv, Cybersecurity News, MIT News, Databricks
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

How Do Document Parsers Break? Auditing Structural Vulnerability in Document Intelligence

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2605.19309v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Document Layout Analysis (DLA) pipelines provide structured page representations for retrieval-augmented generation, long-document question answering, and related applications. Yet their robustness evaluation remains largely area-centric. We identify this Footprint Bias and propose ProSA, a lightweight output-level auditing framework that decouples controlled probing, policy-driven targeting, and structure-aware diagnosis. ProSA combines Block-level Structural Loss Rate (B-SLR), granularity-aware exposure descriptors, and pathway attribution to analyze where structural identity is lost, at what exposure granularity failures emerge, and how failures propagate. Across MinerU and PP-StructureV3 on 1,000 pages, affected area weakly tracks perturbation-induced OCR instability ($R^2=0.384/0.110$), whereas B-SLR aligns much more closely with it ($R^2=0.727/0.916$). Exposure descriptors further separate occlusion- and topology-dominant pathways, while matched-footprint structural probes cause much larger downstream QA/retrieval drops than area-matched erasure. These results shift DLA robustness evaluation from footprint-based measurement toward structure-aware vulnerability auditing.

Title:How Do Document Parsers Break? Auditing Structural Vulnerability in Document Intelligence

Abstract:Document Layout Analysis (DLA) pipelines provide structured page representations for retrieval-augmented generation, long-document question answering, and related applications. Yet their robustness evaluation remains largely area-centric. We identify this Footprint Bias and propose ProSA, a lightweight output-level auditing framework that decouples controlled probing, policy-driven targeting, and structure-aware diagnosis. ProSA combines Block-level Structural Loss Rate (B-SLR), granularity-aware exposure descriptors, and pathway attribution to analyze where structural identity is lost, at what exposure granularity failures emerge, and how failures propagate. Across MinerU and PP-StructureV3 on 1,000 pages, affected area weakly tracks perturbation-induced OCR instability ($R^2=0.384/0.110$), whereas B-SLR aligns much more closely with it ($R^2=0.727/0.916$). Exposure descriptors further separate occlusion- and topology-dominant pathways, while matched-footprint structural probes cause much larger downstream QA/retrieval drops than area-matched erasure. These results shift DLA robustness evaluation from footprint-based measurement toward structure-aware vulnerability auditing.

23 pages, 7 figures. Accepted to EMNLP 2026 Main Conference. Code: this https URL

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2605.19309 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2605.19309v4 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.19309 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 253 words

Related coverage