aiqbench analysis
This research addresses a critical bottleneck in LLM evaluation by introducing a semantic taxonomy and new benchmarks specifically designed to distinguish between verbose but correct answers and those contaminated by hallucinations. The proposed Context-Aware Precision metric offers a more robust method for assessing open-ended question answering compared to existing similarity-based approaches, directly advancing the reliability of measuring modern language model performance.
How Correct Is Your Answer? A Semantic Correctness Framework for Open QA Evaluation
arXiv:2609.01369v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reliable evaluation of open-ended question answering remains a bottleneck for measuring answer correctness of modern LLMs. Unlike multiple-choice tasks, free-form answers may be correct in many surface forms and may fail in qualitatively different ways, including incompleteness, contradiction, overgeneration, and endorsement of false premises. Existing judgment-based and similarity-based metrics often collapse these distinctions. We address this gap with three reusable contributions. First, we introduce a semantic correctness taxonomy that assigns open-ended answers to eight ordered classes, separating verbose-but-correct answers from those contaminated by hallucinated content. Second, we release CAP-Correctness, an 8.8k-example benchmark spanning widely used QA datasets, and CAP-Statements, an 11k-example dataset for converting question-answer pairs into declarative statements for natural language inference (NLI) training and statement-based evaluation. Third, we introduce CAP (Context-Aware Precision), a reference-based metric that scores question-conditioned statements using bidirectional NLI. Under a monotonicity protocol testing whether metrics respect the taxonomy's intended ordering, CAP outperforms established baselines.
Title:How Correct Is Your Answer? A Semantic Correctness Framework for Open QA Evaluation
Abstract:Reliable evaluation of open-ended question answering remains a bottleneck for measuring answer correctness of modern LLMs. Unlike multiple-choice tasks, free-form answers may be correct in many surface forms and may fail in qualitatively different ways, including incompleteness, contradiction, overgeneration, and endorsement of false premises. Existing judgment-based and similarity-based metrics often collapse these distinctions. We address this gap with three reusable contributions. First, we introduce a semantic correctness taxonomy that assigns open-ended answers to eight ordered classes, separating verbose-but-correct answers from those contaminated by hallucinated content. Second, we release CAP-Correctness, an 8.8k-example benchmark spanning widely used QA datasets, and CAP-Statements, an 11k-example dataset for converting question-answer pairs into declarative statements for natural language inference (NLI) training and statement-based evaluation. Third, we introduce CAP (Context-Aware Precision), a reference-based metric that scores question-conditioned statements using bidirectional NLI. Under a monotonicity protocol testing whether metrics respect the taxonomy's intended ordering, CAP outperforms established baselines.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2609.01369 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.01369v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.01369 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 258 words
Related coverage

Presentation: Building Reusable Evaluation Frameworks for Agentic AI Products
InfoQ · Oct 5, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 18, 2026

Building trust in AI agents: A production-ready evaluation framework with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore
AWS · Oct 16, 2026
REALHOP: Rethinking Multi-Hop Reasoning Evaluation via Behavioral Auditing
arXiv · Sep 30, 2026