Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

Headline figures for defence quantum spending range from millions to billions, so the number depends on the measure. The verifiable amounts, roughly $114 million to $141 million a year in disclosed contracts and about $320 million in FY2023 research spending, are far below the $151 billion SHIELD ceiling, which is a cap shared across more than 2,400 holders rather than committed money. Readers tracking quantum funding should look at what has actually been obligated, and treat the 2026 rise as driven by two DARPA deals.
Source coveringQuantum Zeitgeist

How Big Is the Quantum Defence Sector?

Quantum Zeitgeist22 min read

The Pentagon spent about $320 million on quantum research in 2023. Disclosed 2026 contracts rose only on DARPA deals with PsiQuantum and Diraq.

The defence money for quantum technology that anyone can check runs to hundreds of millions of dollars a year, not billions. The Pentagon spent about $320 million on quantum research in FY2023, its latest year of actual spending. Its FY2025 request of about $280 million was 0.2 per cent of the $143 billion it asked for research, development, test and evaluation. The biggest number in quantum defence is $151 billion. It is the ceiling on SHIELD, a Missile Defense Agency contract held by more than 2,400 firms, among them IonQ, Infleqtion, Vector Atomic and QuSecure. A ceiling is the most the government may spend across every holder, over a contract that can run to 2035. So far each of the four has a single order of $500, the same token sum almost every holder received for signing on. That gap is why the size of the quantum defence sector gets quoted at anything from a few million dollars to a few billion. Most of those figures are not wrong. They answer different questions, and this guide keeps them apart. The figures that can be checked are modest. Defence took between a quarter and two-fifths of all federal quantum research money…

Excerpt shown under the publisher's RSS terms · 200 words · full text and figures are on the publisher's site

Related coverage