aiqbench analysis
This research offers critical insights into optimizing Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models by demonstrating that image augmentation should be applied exclusively to the critic module during reinforcement learning, rather than the actor. Applying standard data augmentation techniques to the actor's input causes training collapse, whereas selective augmentation significantly boosts out-of-distribution success rates on robotics benchmarks like LIBERO-Plus. These findings provide essential practical guidance for improving the generalization and robustness of next-generation robotic AI systems.
How (and How Not) to Use Data Augmentation in VLA Post-Training
arXiv:2610.05994v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language-action (VLA) models currently demonstrate strong performance in a wide range of real-world robotics tasks. However, they often still lack the generalization ability to handle large visual out-of-distribution shifts. Post-training of VLAs with reinforcement learning (RL) has been shown to benefit robustness, but significant room for improvement remains. In this work, we systematically study the effect of image augmentation on VLA post-training. We find that it is crucial to augment only the critic module during RL updates, while leaving the actor's input clean during both rollouts and updates. For $\pi_{0.5}$ and GR00T N1.5 this raises out-of-distribution success on LIBERO-Plus by $7.8$ and $10.0$ points respectively, while augmenting the actor collapses training entirely. We investigate a range of augmentation types and strengths, and provide practical recommendations for improving generalization in VLA post-training.
Abstract:Vision-language-action (VLA) models currently demonstrate strong performance in a wide range of real-world robotics tasks. However, they often still lack the generalization ability to handle large visual out-of-distribution shifts. Post-training of VLAs with reinforcement learning (RL) has been shown to benefit robustness, but significant room for improvement remains. In this work, we systematically study the effect of image augmentation on VLA post-training. We find that it is crucial to augment only the critic module during RL updates, while leaving the actor's input clean during both rollouts and updates. For $\pi_{0.5}$ and GR00T N1.5 this raises out-of-distribution success on LIBERO-Plus by $7.8$ and $10.0$ points respectively, while augmenting the actor collapses training entirely. We investigate a range of augmentation types and strengths, and provide practical recommendations for improving generalization in VLA post-training.
Accepted at the NeurIPS 2026 workshop RoboPAD. Code and videos at this https URL
Robotics (cs.RO); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.05994 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2610.05994v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.05994 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 241 words
Related coverage

Preparing data for supervised fine-tuning Part 2: Advanced data strategies
AWS · Aug 26, 2026

Build a Physical AI model factory with NVIDIA Cosmos 3 on SageMaker HyperPod
AWS · Sep 4, 2026

Enhancing industrial safety AI with synthetic data on Amazon SageMaker AI
AWS · Sep 17, 2026
BI-Agent and BI-Bench: Towards Automating End-to-End Business Intelligence
arXiv · Sep 22, 2026