aiqbench analysis
HorusEye presents significant findings on how Large Vision-Language Models (VLMs) perform under severe visual degradation, such as fog and thermal imaging conditions relevant to emergency response scenarios. The study reveals critical model-dependent behaviors, including the "Thermal Paradox" where standard cropping strategies fail in infrared data and specific hallucination risks associated with models like BLIP-2. These insights are vital for researchers developing robust AI systems capable of reliable operation in low-fidelity or hazardous environments.
HorusEye: Language as Dynamic Attention for Emergency Visual Analysis
arXiv:2606.14741v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We introduce HorusEye, Language as Dynamic Attention for Emergency Visual Analysis. Our investigation followed five stages. The first one is benchmarking RefCOCO-Degraded, a dataset of 15,244 images (3,811 base images x 4 conditions: Clean, Fog, Smoke and Thermal) with systematic visual degradation. Through four research questions, we evaluate multiple VLMs (Gemini, Qwen2-VL, BLIP-2, LLaVA, Kosmos-2) across visual grounding the second stage, language feedback recovery the third one, health VQA tasks the fourth, and hallucination analysis the final stage. Our key finding is that language feedback effectiveness is model-dependent: Gemini achieves +47.3% improvement in thermal conditions through iterative language feedback, while Qwen2-VL shows -5.1% degradation under the same protocol. We also identify the 'Thermal Paradox' where cropping strategies that improve RGB performance catastrophically fail in thermal imagery. Furthermore, BLIP-2 uniquely hallucinates more under degradation, making it unsuitable for emergency deployment
Abstract:We introduce HorusEye, Language as Dynamic Attention for Emergency Visual Analysis. Our investigation followed five stages. The first one is benchmarking RefCOCO-Degraded, a dataset of 15,244 images (3,811 base images x 4 conditions: Clean, Fog, Smoke and Thermal) with systematic visual degradation. Through four research questions, we evaluate multiple VLMs (Gemini, Qwen2-VL, BLIP-2, LLaVA, Kosmos-2) across visual grounding the second stage, language feedback recovery the third one, health VQA tasks the fourth, and hallucination analysis the final stage. Our key finding is that language feedback effectiveness is model-dependent: Gemini achieves +47.3% improvement in thermal conditions through iterative language feedback, while Qwen2-VL shows -5.1% degradation under the same protocol. We also identify the 'Thermal Paradox' where cropping strategies that improve RGB performance catastrophically fail in thermal imagery. Furthermore, BLIP-2 uniquely hallucinates more under degradation, making it unsuitable for emergency deployment
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2606.14741 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2606.14741v2 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.14741 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 237 words
Related coverage
HorusEye: Language as Dynamic Attention for Emergency Visual Analysis
arXiv · Jun 16, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 10, 2026
Attention at Rest Stays at Rest: Breaking Visual Inertia to Mitigate Relation Hallucinations
arXiv · Oct 8, 2026
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · Jul 31, 2026