Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Products

aiqbench analysis

This study presents SCANAR and AIDOC, open-source tools that leverage large language models and semantic embeddings to automate horizon scanning in healthcare. By reducing manual review efforts by approximately 65% while maintaining high recall, these systems demonstrate the practical utility of AI for accelerating information retrieval in specialized domains. The work validates a significant efficiency gain over traditional methods without relying on proprietary black-box solutions.
Sources coveringarXiv, Quantum Zeitgeist, Latent Space, itbusinessnet.com
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Horizon Scans can be accelerated using novel information retrieval and artificial intelligence tools

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2504.01627v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Introduction: Horizon scanning in healthcare assesses early signals of innovation, crucial for timely adoption. Current horizon scanning faces challenges in efficient information retrieval and analysis, especially in grey literature, presenting a need for innovative tools. Methodology: This article introduces SCANAR and AIDOC, open-source Python-based tools designed to improve horizon scanning. SCANAR automates the retrieval and processing of news articles, using de-duplication and unsupervised relevancy ranking. AIDOC aids filtration by leveraging large language models and text embeddings for calculation of semantic similarity, to reorder data based on relevancy. Results: Twelve internal datasets from horizon scans and four external benchmarking datasets were used. SCANAR improved retrieval efficiency by automating processes previously dependent on manual labour. AIDOC displayed work-saving potential, achieving around 65% theoretic reduction in manual review efforts at 95% recall or 20% reduction when adding CMH, an existing open-source algorithm to make data-driven decisions on stopping screening early. Comparative analysis with benchmarking data showed AIDOC's performance was similar to existing systematic review automation tools, though performance varied depending on dataset characteristics. Conclusion: The validation indicates that SCANAR and AIDOC show potential to enhance horizon scanning efficiency by streamlining data retrieval and prioritisation. These tools may alleviate methodological limitations and allow broader, swifter horizon scans. Further studies are suggested to optimize these models and to design new workflows and validation processes that integrate large language models.

Abstract:Introduction: Horizon scanning in healthcare assesses early signals of innovation, crucial for timely adoption. Current horizon scanning faces challenges in efficient information retrieval and analysis, especially in grey literature, presenting a need for innovative tools. Methodology: This article introduces SCANAR and AIDOC, open-source Python-based tools designed to improve horizon scanning. SCANAR automates the retrieval and processing of news articles, using de-duplication and unsupervised relevancy ranking. AIDOC aids filtration by leveraging large language models and text embeddings for calculation of semantic similarity, to reorder data based on relevancy. Results: Twelve internal datasets from horizon scans and four external benchmarking datasets were used. SCANAR improved retrieval efficiency by automating processes previously dependent on manual labour. AIDOC displayed work-saving potential, achieving around 65% theoretic reduction in manual review efforts at 95% recall or 20% reduction when adding CMH, an existing open-source algorithm to make data-driven decisions on stopping screening early. Comparative analysis with benchmarking data showed AIDOC's performance was similar to existing systematic review automation tools, though performance varied depending on dataset characteristics. Conclusion: The validation indicates that SCANAR and AIDOC show potential to enhance horizon scanning efficiency by streamlining data retrieval and prioritisation. These tools may alleviate methodological limitations and allow broader, swifter horizon scans. Further studies are suggested to optimize these models and to design new workflows and validation processes that integrate large language models.

Information Retrieval (cs.IR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2504.01627 [cs.IR]

(or arXiv:2504.01627v2 [cs.IR] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.01627 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 323 words

Related coverage