Off-topic for aiqbench
This story was gathered from a source we follow but falls outside AI and quantum coverage, so there is no aiqbench take for it.
Honesty is the Best Policy ... or is it? Demand Management for Probabilistic Service Options
arXiv:2610.21351v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: To enable well-informed customer choices and redistribute demand across service options, providers can display probabilities regarding predicted service levels at the time of booking, effectively offering probabilistic service options. In many service settings, the underlying truthful probabilities endogenously depend on the system state, rather than being static product attributes controlled by the provider. While customers rely on this information when making decisions, they cannot readily verify its accuracy. Consequently, providers may be tempted to manipulate the displayed probabilities to guide customers' choices in their favor, creating a novel lever for demand management. In this work, we model the resulting problem as a sequential decision process, define truthful probabilities recursively, and introduce transparency constraints that limit their distortion. Because the exact computation of truthful probabilities is intractable for realistic settings, we develop an adapted reinforcement learning algorithm to approximate them. Furthermore, we propose a sampling-based mixed-integer program to optimize the information communicated by the provider in each state. Our framework enables providers to gauge the benefits of dynamically disclosing probabilistic information at the time of booking and sheds light on incentives for manipulation. Our computational study is motivated by out-of-home delivery, i.e., the delivery to parcel lockers or shops, and reveals a trade-off between individual-level transparency and aggregate customer utilities.
Title:Honesty is the Best Policy ... or is it? Demand Management for Probabilistic Service Options
Abstract:To enable well-informed customer choices and redistribute demand across service options, providers can display probabilities regarding predicted service levels at the time of booking, effectively offering probabilistic service options. In many service settings, the underlying truthful probabilities endogenously depend on the system state, rather than being static product attributes controlled by the provider. While customers rely on this information when making decisions, they cannot readily verify its accuracy. Consequently, providers may be tempted to manipulate the displayed probabilities to guide customers' choices in their favor, creating a novel lever for demand management. In this work, we model the resulting problem as a sequential decision process, define truthful probabilities recursively, and introduce transparency constraints that limit their distortion. Because the exact computation of truthful probabilities is intractable for realistic settings, we develop an adapted reinforcement learning algorithm to approximate them. Furthermore, we propose a sampling-based mixed-integer program to optimize the information communicated by the provider in each state. Our framework enables providers to gauge the benefits of dynamically disclosing probabilistic information at the time of booking and sheds light on incentives for manipulation. Our computational study is motivated by out-of-home delivery, i.e., the delivery to parcel lockers or shops, and reveals a trade-off between individual-level transparency and aggregate customer utilities.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Optimization and Control (math.OC)
arXiv:2610.21351 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.21351v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.21351 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 322 words
Related coverage

Why I Left Google DeepMind
LessWrong · Jul 15, 2026

Building trust in AI agents: A production-ready evaluation framework with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore
AWS · Oct 16, 2026

Top 10 Best Web Application Firewall (WAF) in 2026
Cybersecurity News · Aug 1, 2026

Top 10 Best Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) Solutions in 2026
Cybersecurity News · Jul 17, 2026