aiqbench analysis
This paper investigates the mathematical conditions required to merge distinct quantum measurement contexts into unified classical representations, distinguishing between global and protocolwise integration methods. By analyzing operator-algebraic compatibility in relation to Bell-CHSH experiments, it clarifies how non-locality obstructions specifically impact cross-context identifications rather than classical representation itself.
Holevo classicalisation and context integration: Global versus protocolwise integration
arXiv:2509.08487v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Suppose that a family of commutative measurement contexts is given, together with the corresponding classical probability laws. We study the problem under what conditions these contextwise descriptions can be combined into a single classical representation. We distinguish two ways in which this can be done. In {\em global integration}, the prescribed observable algebras are required to fit into a single commutative context and the corresponding probability laws to arise as marginals of one joint law. In {\em protocolwise integration}, by contrast, the context label is retained as part of the description, and the contextwise laws appear as conditional distributions within a single model of the measurement protocol. We show that global integration involves two distinct notions of compatibility: operator-algebraic compatibility of the underlying observables and probabilistic compatibility of their classicalised laws. The former implies the latter, but the converse fails; under the topological hypotheses stated below, probabilistic compatibility is characterised by a Kellerer-type marginal criterion. Protocolwise integration, on the other hand, always exists and is represented operator-algebraically by a direct-sum construction. When global integration exists, the two constructions arise as reductions of a common commutative refinement. We illustrate the distinction in the Bell--CHSH experiment, where Fine's theorem relates global probabilistic integration to Bell locality and the CHSH inequalities. This shows that the obstruction revealed by Bell--CHSH concerns not classical representation as such, but classical representation preserving specified cross-context identifications.
Abstract:Suppose that a family of commutative measurement contexts is given, together with the corresponding classical probability laws. We study the problem under what conditions these contextwise descriptions can be combined into a single classical representation. We distinguish two ways in which this can be done. In {\em global integration}, the prescribed observable algebras are required to fit into a single commutative context and the corresponding probability laws to arise as marginals of one joint law. In {\em protocolwise integration}, by contrast, the context label is retained as part of the description, and the contextwise laws appear as conditional distributions within a single model of the measurement protocol. We show that global integration involves two distinct notions of compatibility: operator-algebraic compatibility of the underlying observables and probabilistic compatibility of their classicalised laws. The former implies the latter, but the converse fails; under the topological hypotheses stated below, probabilistic compatibility is characterised by a Kellerer-type marginal criterion. Protocolwise integration, on the other hand, always exists and is represented operator-algebraically by a direct-sum construction. When global integration exists, the two constructions arise as reductions of a common commutative refinement. We illustrate the distinction in the Bell--CHSH experiment, where Fine's theorem relates global probabilistic integration to Bell locality and the CHSH inequalities. This shows that the obstruction revealed by Bell--CHSH concerns not classical representation as such, but classical representation preserving specified cross-context identifications.
The paper has been thoroughly revised. Submitted for publication,33 pages
arXiv:2509.08487 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2509.08487v2 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.08487 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 328 words
Related coverage

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 10, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Oct 3, 2026

Stock Market Today Highlights, Sept 2: Sensex ends 373 pts lower at 76, 570, Nifty below 24, 000; Asian Paints, HDFC Bank fall most
thehindubusinessline.com · Sep 2, 2026
[AINews] AI Engineer NYC: Gemini 4 Argon, Vals AI Benchmarks
Latent Space · Oct 14, 2026