Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

HiPaper is a research prototype for literature review that lets researchers inspect and revise intermediate AI outputs, rather than submitting a query and waiting for a finished report. The evaluation is a user study with 14 PhD students, a small sample that supports qualitative claims about workflow usability more than broad performance gains. For AI readers, the main takeaway is the design pattern: exposing intermediate model outputs as editable, evidence-traceable artifacts in a persistent workspace.
Source coveringarXiv

HiPaper: A Human-AI Collaborative System for Academic Literature Triage and Scholarly Sensemaking

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2611.00762v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Scholarly sensemaking requires researchers to iteratively retrieve, collect, and synthesize literature as their understanding evolves. However, existing scholarly tools provide only partial support for this process. Recent artificial intelligence (AI)-based systems generally rely on opaque submit-and-wait pipelines that it users' ability to inspect, revise, and validate intermediate outputs. In this study, we present HiPaper, a human-AI collaborative literature review system informed by a formative study with academic experts. HiPaper organizes scholarly sensemaking as a three-stage interactive workflow spanning Retrieval, Collection, andSynthesis, centralized on the human-in-the-loop paradigm that exposes intermediate AI-generated content for user inspection and intervention through a persistent workspace called Knowledge Pocket. Through this workflow, users can iteratively refine search intent, curate and organize papers with AI-enriched metadata and clustering, and conduct evidence-traceable synthesis over selected literature. Our user study with 14 Ph.D. students showed that HiPaper efficiently supports scholarly sensemaking by enabling human-AI collaboration in both familiar and unfamiliar domains. Furthermore, the findings highlight how staged interactions with intermediate AI-generated content successfully scaffold user interactions throughout the sensemaking process.

Abstract:Scholarly sensemaking requires researchers to iteratively retrieve, collect, and synthesize literature as their understanding evolves. However, existing scholarly tools provide only partial support for this process. Recent artificial intelligence (AI)-based systems generally rely on opaque submit-and-wait pipelines that it users' ability to inspect, revise, and validate intermediate outputs. In this study, we present HiPaper, a human-AI collaborative literature review system informed by a formative study with academic experts. HiPaper organizes scholarly sensemaking as a three-stage interactive workflow spanning Retrieval, Collection, andSynthesis, centralized on the human-in-the-loop paradigm that exposes intermediate AI-generated content for user inspection and intervention through a persistent workspace called Knowledge Pocket. Through this workflow, users can iteratively refine search intent, curate and organize papers with AI-enriched metadata and clustering, and conduct evidence-traceable synthesis over selected literature. Our user study with 14 Ph.D. students showed that HiPaper efficiently supports scholarly sensemaking by enabling human-AI collaboration in both familiar and unfamiliar domains. Furthermore, the findings highlight how staged interactions with intermediate AI-generated content successfully scaffold user interactions throughout the sensemaking process.

Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Information Retrieval (cs.IR)

arXiv:2611.00762 [cs.HC]

(or arXiv:2611.00762v1 [cs.HC] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.00762 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 271 words

Related coverage