Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces Highlight-Then-Summarize (H2S), a novel compress-then-reason paradigm that explicitly selects task-relevant evidence before generating answers to improve long-context reasoning. By training with process-level rewards on a large-scale dataset, the H2S-14B model outperforms larger open-source counterparts while significantly reducing output token budgets without sacrificing accuracy. The work demonstrates that structured evidence integration is a critical mechanism for scaling LLM capabilities over massive contexts like 128K tokens.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Highlight-Then-Summarize: Learning to Compress Evidence for Long-Context Understanding

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.31382v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-context understanding requires large language models (LLMs) to reason over lengthy documents, conversations, and code, yet task-relevant evidence is often sparse and scattered amid substantial irrelevant and redundant content. We propose Highlight-Then-Summarize (H2S), a compress-then-reason paradigm that first identifies source-grounded, question-relevant evidence and then integrates it into a compact, question-conditioned summary before producing the final answer. To train this behavior, we construct H2S-Dataset, comprising 6,647 examples from 11 benchmark families with an average context length of 43.9K tokens, and introduce H2S-RL, which provides process-level rewards for evidence selection and summary construction in addition to final-answer correctness. We evaluate on H2S-Bench, a seven-task long-context suite. Under a shared 128K input and 4K output budget, H2S-14B achieves an average score of 32.60, outperforming Qwen3.8-27B by 10.17 points and obtaining the strongest overall result among the evaluated open-source models. H2S-14B also achieves the highest Evidence-Summary Quality score and retains 97.1% of its 16K-budget performance with only a 4K output budget. These results show that explicitly selecting and integrating evidence improves long-context reasoning while enabling more compact generation.

Authors:Zhaoyuan Xia (1 and 2), Qinghongbing Xie (3), Yung Xiang Hue (3), Jianguang Jiang (2), Gaofeng Lu (2), Zhenyu Jiao (2), Xing Yuan (2), Dai Dai (2), Tong Mo (1), Long Zeng (3) ((1) Peking University, (2) Baidu Inc., (3) Tsinghua University)

Abstract:Long-context understanding requires large language models (LLMs) to reason over lengthy documents, conversations, and code, yet task-relevant evidence is often sparse and scattered amid substantial irrelevant and redundant content. We propose Highlight-Then-Summarize (H2S), a compress-then-reason paradigm that first identifies source-grounded, question-relevant evidence and then integrates it into a compact, question-conditioned summary before producing the final answer. To train this behavior, we construct H2S-Dataset, comprising 6,647 examples from 11 benchmark families with an average context length of 43.9K tokens, and introduce H2S-RL, which provides process-level rewards for evidence selection and summary construction in addition to final-answer correctness. We evaluate on H2S-Bench, a seven-task long-context suite. Under a shared 128K input and 4K output budget, H2S-14B achieves an average score of 32.60, outperforming Qwen3.8-27B by 10.17 points and obtaining the strongest overall result among the evaluated open-source models. H2S-14B also achieves the highest Evidence-Summary Quality score and retains 97.1% of its 16K-budget performance with only a 4K output budget. These results show that explicitly selecting and integrating evidence improves long-context reasoning while enabling more compact generation.

23 pages, 13 figures. Zhaoyuan Xia and Qinghongbing Xie contributed equally. Corresponding authors: Dai Dai, Tong Mo, and Long Zeng. Code and data are available at this https URL

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2609.31382 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2609.31382v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.31382 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 267 words

Related coverage