aiqbench analysis
This research addresses critical stability and robustness issues in imitation learning and reinforcement learning by introducing higher-order action supervision to improve temporal consistency. The proposed loss scheme acts as a lightweight, plug-and-play module that enhances policy performance without requiring structural changes to existing models. It demonstrates significant gains in continuous control environments and out-of-distribution generalization, particularly under low-data regimes.
Higher-Order Action Supervision Makes A Strong Policy Class
arXiv:2610.11175v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern data-driven decision-making methods, such as imitation learning (IL) and reinforcement learning (RL), have achieved great success in solving many complex tasks. However, these methods often suffer from serious control instability and robustness issues when applied in real-world applications such as robotics and autonomous driving, posing notable challenges for their practical deployment. We argue that this instability issue stems largely from their limitations in solely supervising and optimizing zeroth-order actions (i.e., the action labels), failing to account for higher-order action dynamics and temporal consistency. In this paper, we show that simultaneously supervising both zeroth- and first-order actions can dramatically enhance policies' performance and control robustness. To achieve this, we introduce a novel and elegant loss scheme supported by formal theoretical guarantees that can equip any off-the-shelf policy model (e.g., deterministic, stochastic, or flow policies) with the capability for higher-order action supervision, without requiring any structural modifications. Moreover, our proposed method can serve as a lightweight plug-and-play module that seamlessly integrates with a broad spectrum of existing offline RL frameworks. Extensive evaluations on OGBench and D4RL demonstrate that our approach yields substantial performance and robustness improvements across a wide range of continuous control environments. Notably, our method can also enhance policies' out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization capability in the challenging low-data regime, making it an ideal tool in tackling many real-world control problems.
Abstract:Modern data-driven decision-making methods, such as imitation learning (IL) and reinforcement learning (RL), have achieved great success in solving many complex tasks. However, these methods often suffer from serious control instability and robustness issues when applied in real-world applications such as robotics and autonomous driving, posing notable challenges for their practical deployment. We argue that this instability issue stems largely from their limitations in solely supervising and optimizing zeroth-order actions (i.e., the action labels), failing to account for higher-order action dynamics and temporal consistency. In this paper, we show that simultaneously supervising both zeroth- and first-order actions can dramatically enhance policies' performance and control robustness. To achieve this, we introduce a novel and elegant loss scheme supported by formal theoretical guarantees that can equip any off-the-shelf policy model (e.g., deterministic, stochastic, or flow policies) with the capability for higher-order action supervision, without requiring any structural modifications. Moreover, our proposed method can serve as a lightweight plug-and-play module that seamlessly integrates with a broad spectrum of existing offline RL frameworks. Extensive evaluations on OGBench and D4RL demonstrate that our approach yields substantial performance and robustness improvements across a wide range of continuous control environments. Notably, our method can also enhance policies' out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization capability in the challenging low-data regime, making it an ideal tool in tackling many real-world control problems.
34 pages, 7 figures. Accepted at NeurIPS 2026
Robotics (cs.RO); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.11175 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2610.11175v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.11175 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 324 words
Related coverage

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 18, 2026

GLM-5.3 Sometimes Considers How Train-Time Actions Shape Future Behavior
LessWrong · Oct 15, 2026

Debate Training Reduces Reward Hacking in RLAIF
AI Alignment Forum · Aug 19, 2026

[AINews] Meta Muse Wonder & Wonder Full: MSL’s Claude 5.5-tier Frontier Model
Latent Space · Oct 13, 2026