Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research establishes high-probability bounds for linear accessibility in neural networks, demonstrating that sufficient dimensionality scales linearly rather than quadratically under subgaussian noise. By framing feature superposition as a compressed sensing problem, the study provides a rigorous framework for evaluating sparse autoencoders and compositional generalization. These findings offer critical theoretical insights into the geometric constraints of the linear representation hypothesis in modern deep learning architectures.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

High-probability guarantees for linear accessibility in feature superposition

arXiv1 min read

arXiv:2609.09556v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Neural networks can leverage feature superposition to encode more concepts than dimensions, but cross-feature interference constrains the linear accessibility of simultaneously active features. By framing linear accessibility as a compressed sensing problem, we derive high-probability bounds for fixed supports under subgaussian noise, proving the sufficient dimension scales linearly ($d=O_{\varepsilon}(k \log m)$) rather than prior worst-case quadratic limits. We then validate these bounds across system parameters through Gaussian-tail approximations. These results quantify the geometric constraints of the linear representation hypothesis, providing a framework for evaluating sparse autoencoders, compositional generalization, and neural interpretability.

Abstract:Neural networks can leverage feature superposition to encode more concepts than dimensions, but cross-feature interference constrains the linear accessibility of simultaneously active features. By framing linear accessibility as a compressed sensing problem, we derive high-probability bounds for fixed supports under subgaussian noise, proving the sufficient dimension scales linearly ($d=O_{\varepsilon}(k \log m)$) rather than prior worst-case quadratic limits. We then validate these bounds across system parameters through Gaussian-tail approximations. These results quantify the geometric constraints of the linear representation hypothesis, providing a framework for evaluating sparse autoencoders, compositional generalization, and neural interpretability.

Machine Learning (stat.ML); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Information Retrieval (cs.IR); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Probability (math.PR)

arXiv:2609.09556 [stat.ML]

(or arXiv:2609.09556v1 [stat.ML] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.09556 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 196 words

Related coverage