aiqbench analysis
This research exposes a critical failure mode in concept erasure where linear projection methods inadvertently destroy both entangled features instead of isolating the target, revealing that gradient descent converges to distinct "mirror" or "shadow" solutions that leave recoverable traces of suppressed knowledge. The study provides a mechanistic, causally-validated explanation for why unlearning in large language models often results in knowledge resurfacing rather than true deletion, offering a rigorous foundation for improving AI safety protocols.
Hidden not Deleted: How Networks Suppress Entangled Features
arXiv:2609.27593v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Concept erasure methods that operate via linear projection assume that features occupy separable subspaces. We show this assumption fails under dense superposition: when two features are forced into an antipodal pair sharing a single subspace, state-of-the-art linear erasure destroys both, not just the target. Networks trained with gradient descent instead solve this problem non-linearly, but not uniformly: they converge to one of two distinct circuit-level solutions depending on initialization, which we call mirror and shadow solutions. We map this bifurcation as a function of feature entanglement, show it reflects a stable attractor structure rather than an artifact of our setup, and use targeted causal interventions to demonstrate that both solutions leave a substantial, measurable trace of the erased feature's representation intact, recoverable through a single scalar patch rather than requiring any further training. This mirrors a failure mode recently observed empirically in LLM unlearning, where suppression rather than deletion allows forgotten knowledge to resurface; our results offer a mechanistic, causally-validated account of why that failure mode occurs.
Abstract:Concept erasure methods that operate via linear projection assume that features occupy separable subspaces. We show this assumption fails under dense superposition: when two features are forced into an antipodal pair sharing a single subspace, state-of-the-art linear erasure destroys both, not just the target. Networks trained with gradient descent instead solve this problem non-linearly, but not uniformly: they converge to one of two distinct circuit-level solutions depending on initialization, which we call mirror and shadow solutions. We map this bifurcation as a function of feature entanglement, show it reflects a stable attractor structure rather than an artifact of our setup, and use targeted causal interventions to demonstrate that both solutions leave a substantial, measurable trace of the erased feature's representation intact, recoverable through a single scalar patch rather than requiring any further training. This mirrors a failure mode recently observed empirically in LLM unlearning, where suppression rather than deletion allows forgotten knowledge to resurface; our results offer a mechanistic, causally-validated account of why that failure mode occurs.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.27593 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.27593v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.27593 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 264 words
Related coverage

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026
J++ Lens: Jacobian Filtering Enables More Faithful Workspace Lenses
LessWrong · Oct 8, 2026

Reflections on unlearning and inoculation
LessWrong · Sep 20, 2026

Evaluating task vectors, unlearning and inoculation
LessWrong · Sep 20, 2026