Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This paper proposes HarnessMDP, a framework that treats the execution harness of LLM agents as a learnable control layer via offline reinforcement learning. By formulating agent execution as a Markov decision process, it enables adaptive selection of structural actions to improve performance on coding and benchmark tasks. The work advances the methodology for optimizing multi-step agent workflows through data-driven policy learning rather than static configuration.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

HarnessMDP: Learning to Control LLM Agent Harnesses with Offline Reinforcement Learning

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2607.05458v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The execution harness is a critical component of LLM agents, shaping how the agent interacts with its environment and organizes multi-step execution. Prior work has shown that improving tools, workflows, and other harness components can substantially improve agent performance. This suggests that the harness can be treated as a learnable control layer that adapts execution decisions from experience, rather than as a predetermined execution configuration. In this work, we introduce HarnessMDP, a learning-based framework that makes harness control itself learnable. HarnessMDP formulates agent execution as a finite-horizon Markov decision process, where the harness learns to select structural execution actions from the evolving agent state. The harness policy is learned offline from collected trajectories using task performance and deployed online to adaptively control new executions. Extensive experiments on coding tasks, tau-bench, AgentBench, and other agent evaluation settings show that HarnessMDP consistently improves execution behavior and final task performance over baseline harnesses. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of HarnessMDP and establish learnable harness control as a practical mechanism for improving LLM agents through better execution.

Abstract:The execution harness is a critical component of LLM agents, shaping how the agent interacts with its environment and organizes multi-step execution. Prior work has shown that improving tools, workflows, and other harness components can substantially improve agent performance. This suggests that the harness can be treated as a learnable control layer that adapts execution decisions from experience, rather than as a predetermined execution configuration. In this work, we introduce HarnessMDP, a learning-based framework that makes harness control itself learnable. HarnessMDP formulates agent execution as a finite-horizon Markov decision process, where the harness learns to select structural execution actions from the evolving agent state. The harness policy is learned offline from collected trajectories using task performance and deployed online to adaptively control new executions. Extensive experiments on coding tasks, tau-bench, AgentBench, and other agent evaluation settings show that HarnessMDP consistently improves execution behavior and final task performance over baseline harnesses. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of HarnessMDP and establish learnable harness control as a practical mechanism for improving LLM agents through better execution.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2607.05458 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2607.05458v2 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.05458 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 268 words

Related coverage