Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This study provides a critical empirical analysis of memory substrates for long-horizon LLM agents, demonstrating that no single storage medium universally dominates across different operating regimes. The findings highlight the necessity of adaptive substrate routing to balance retrieval benefits against attention dilution in sequential decision-making tasks while managing scalability costs at extended history lengths.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Harness the Memory: A Holistic Evaluation of Memory Substrates in Memory Agents

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2608.15008v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Memory is becoming core infrastructure for long-horizon LLM agents, yet existing evaluations offer limited guidance on which memory substrate, namely the underlying medium in which memory is represented and stored, should be used under different operating regimes. We present a controlled harness evaluation of memory substrates for memory-augmented agents, covering dense and sparse indices, text records, structural stores, hierarchical stores, refinement-based memories, parametric updates, and activation-compatible context mechanisms. Across three backbone models and four benchmark suites spanning user-centric question answering and agent-centric decision-making, we instrument 26 performance and efficiency metrics under a unified harness. Our results show that no single substrate consistently dominates: broad retrieval benefits long-context factual QA, while excessive retrieval can harm sequential decision-making by shifting attention away from action-critical context. Scalability introduces a further routing axis, as substrates that perform well at moderate history lengths can become costly or brittle at longer horizons. These findings motivate substrate routing as a necessary component of adaptive agent memory systems and provide empirical guidance for designing efficient, reliable, and regime-aware long-term memory for LLM agents. Code will be made available upon acceptance.

Authors:Wei-Chieh Huang, Weizhi Zhang, Yuchen Wu, Yankai Chen, Eric Hanchen Jiang, Wooseong Yang, Yiwei Yang, Henry Peng Zou, Hanrong Zhang, Ying Nian Wu, Haolun Wu, Kai-Wei Chang, Philip S. Yu, Xue Liu, Aylin Caliskan

Abstract:Memory is becoming core infrastructure for long-horizon LLM agents, yet existing evaluations offer limited guidance on which memory substrate, namely the underlying medium in which memory is represented and stored, should be used under different operating regimes. We present a controlled harness evaluation of memory substrates for memory-augmented agents, covering dense and sparse indices, text records, structural stores, hierarchical stores, refinement-based memories, parametric updates, and activation-compatible context mechanisms. Across three backbone models and four benchmark suites spanning user-centric question answering and agent-centric decision-making, we instrument 26 performance and efficiency metrics under a unified harness. Our results show that no single substrate consistently dominates: broad retrieval benefits long-context factual QA, while excessive retrieval can harm sequential decision-making by shifting attention away from action-critical context. Scalability introduces a further routing axis, as substrates that perform well at moderate history lengths can become costly or brittle at longer horizons. These findings motivate substrate routing as a necessary component of adaptive agent memory systems and provide empirical guidance for designing efficient, reliable, and regime-aware long-term memory for LLM agents. Code will be made available upon acceptance.

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2608.15008 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2608.15008v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.15008 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 235 words

Related coverage