Off-topic for aiqbench
This story was gathered from a source we follow but falls outside AI and quantum coverage, so there is no aiqbench take for it.
Hardening Soft Information: Evidence on Analyst Integration Costs
arXiv:2505.12269v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We examine how the cost of transforming qualitative information into precise numerical estimates--a form of integration cost--creates a structural friction in expectations formation. To isolate this integration cost from the costs of information awareness and acquisition, we exploit sell-side analyst reports, in which the same forecaster simultaneously produces textual narratives and numerical forecasts. Because the information underlying the text has already been acquired, any systematic gap between the two outputs can be attributed to integration costs. We document systematic quantification inefficiency: an analyst's textual tone negatively predicts her contemporaneous forecast errors and positively predicts her subsequent numerical revisions, revealing that analysts leave part of their qualitative insights unquantified until further evidence arrives. Consistent with this integration-friction explanation, this inefficiency intensifies when reports are linguistically vaguer, environmental uncertainty is higher, or analysts' processing capacity is more constrained, and it persists where strategic and behavioral explanations are weaker. Our findings provide direct, large-sample evidence that integration costs constitute a distinct economic friction, explaining why soft information carries value-relevant content beyond contemporaneous hard numbers.
Abstract:We examine how the cost of transforming qualitative information into precise numerical estimates--a form of integration cost--creates a structural friction in expectations formation. To isolate this integration cost from the costs of information awareness and acquisition, we exploit sell-side analyst reports, in which the same forecaster simultaneously produces textual narratives and numerical forecasts. Because the information underlying the text has already been acquired, any systematic gap between the two outputs can be attributed to integration costs. We document systematic quantification inefficiency: an analyst's textual tone negatively predicts her contemporaneous forecast errors and positively predicts her subsequent numerical revisions, revealing that analysts leave part of their qualitative insights unquantified until further evidence arrives. Consistent with this integration-friction explanation, this inefficiency intensifies when reports are linguistically vaguer, environmental uncertainty is higher, or analysts' processing capacity is more constrained, and it persists where strategic and behavioral explanations are weaker. Our findings provide direct, large-sample evidence that integration costs constitute a distinct economic friction, explaining why soft information carries value-relevant content beyond contemporaneous hard numbers.
General Economics (econ.GN); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Logic (math.LO); General Finance (q-fin.GN)
arXiv:2505.12269 [econ.GN]
(or arXiv:2505.12269v4 [econ.GN] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.12269 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 275 words
Related coverage

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · Sep 24, 2026

Govern AI agent tool access with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore Gateway
AWS · Aug 21, 2026
.webp%3Fssl%3D1&w=320)
Top 50 Best Penetration Testing Companies in 2026
Cybersecurity News · Jul 31, 2026

Why I Left Google DeepMind
LessWrong · Jul 15, 2026