aiqbench analysis
This research establishes fundamental lower bounds for Hamiltonian property testing, proving that achieving Heisenberg-limited scaling ($1/\varepsilon$) is impossible when only forward time-evolution operators are accessible. By matching existing upper bounds with $\Omega(1/\varepsilon^2)$ requirements, the study clarifies the intrinsic limitations of quantum algorithms in learning and certifying local Hamiltonians without inverse queries. These findings are critical for understanding the theoretical efficiency limits of near-term quantum sensing and characterization protocols.
Hamiltonian locality testing and certification do not achieve the Heisenberg limit
arXiv:2610.03205v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We establish lower bounds for Hamiltonian property testing with access to the time-evolution operator but not its inverse. Each experiment may query the time-evolution operator multiple times, and distances between Hamiltonians are measured in the normalized Frobenius norm. In this model, we show that testing whether a Hamiltonian is $k$-local or $\varepsilon$-far from every $k$-local Hamiltonian requires $\Omega(1/\varepsilon^2)$ total evolution time, matching the upper bound of Kallaugher and Liang (TQC'25). We also prove that testing whether an unknown Hamiltonian equals a target Hamiltonian or is $\varepsilon$-far from it requires $\Omega(1/\varepsilon^2)$ total evolution time, matching the upper bound of Sinha and Tong (2025). These are the first lower bounds for natural problems in Hamiltonian learning and testing that rule out Heisenberg-limited scaling of $1/\varepsilon$. As a third result, we show that amplitude estimation to precision $\varepsilon$ requires $\Omega(1/\varepsilon^2)$ total time evolution, recovering the result of Tang and Wright (QIP'26) in the continuous-time query model. All three results follow from the hardness of distinguishing the zero Hamiltonian from a suitably chosen ensemble of random Hamiltonians. We establish this hardness by adapting the continuous-time adversary method to forward Hamiltonian evolution.
Abstract:We establish lower bounds for Hamiltonian property testing with access to the time-evolution operator but not its inverse. Each experiment may query the time-evolution operator multiple times, and distances between Hamiltonians are measured in the normalized Frobenius norm. In this model, we show that testing whether a Hamiltonian is $k$-local or $\varepsilon$-far from every $k$-local Hamiltonian requires $\Omega(1/\varepsilon^2)$ total evolution time, matching the upper bound of Kallaugher and Liang (TQC'25). We also prove that testing whether an unknown Hamiltonian equals a target Hamiltonian or is $\varepsilon$-far from it requires $\Omega(1/\varepsilon^2)$ total evolution time, matching the upper bound of Sinha and Tong (2025). These are the first lower bounds for natural problems in Hamiltonian learning and testing that rule out Heisenberg-limited scaling of $1/\varepsilon$. As a third result, we show that amplitude estimation to precision $\varepsilon$ requires $\Omega(1/\varepsilon^2)$ total time evolution, recovering the result of Tang and Wright (QIP'26) in the continuous-time query model. All three results follow from the hardness of distinguishing the zero Hamiltonian from a suitably chosen ensemble of random Hamiltonians. We establish this hardness by adapting the continuous-time adversary method to forward Hamiltonian evolution.
Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Computational Complexity (cs.CC); Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.03205 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2610.03205v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.03205 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 292 words
Related coverage
The power of time reversal in Hamiltonian property testing
arXiv · Oct 6, 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jun 7, 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026

Measurement incompatibility in Bayesian multiparameter quantum estimation
Quantum Journal · Aug 13, 2026