Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

HalluTracer addresses the reliability risk of large language models by aggregating truthfulness signals across all layers of the forward pass rather than relying on isolated components. This depth-averaging approach suppresses layer-specific noise and captures nearly all linearly accessible information, outperforming existing white-box baselines in detecting hallucinations. The work effectively reframes detection as a geometric aggregation problem governed by signal sparsity within model representations.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

HalluTracer: Hallucination Detection via Depth-Averaging Truth Signals

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2608.16353v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Even well-aligned large language models confidently generate factually incorrect text, making hallucination a persistent reliability risk in high-stakes deployments. These models nonetheless carry linearly separable truthfulness signals in their internal representations. Existing white-box detectors, however, collapse this evidence to isolated components or a single depth, discarding discriminative information distributed across the full forward pass. We introduce HalluTracer, a detection framework that reads and aggregates truthfulness evidence across every layer of the forward pass before the model emits any answer token. A geometric analysis reveals that the per-layer signals are weakly correlated, so that simple depth averaging suppresses layer-specific noise and captures nearly all linearly accessible information. Across six open-source language models and five hallucination benchmarks, HalluTracer consistently outperforms matched white-box baselines, with gains ranging from one to fourteen points. Collectively, our work recasts hallucination detection from a layer-selection problem into a depth-aggregation problem governed by the geometric sparsity of the truthfulness signal.

Abstract:Even well-aligned large language models confidently generate factually incorrect text, making hallucination a persistent reliability risk in high-stakes deployments. These models nonetheless carry linearly separable truthfulness signals in their internal representations. Existing white-box detectors, however, collapse this evidence to isolated components or a single depth, discarding discriminative information distributed across the full forward pass. We introduce HalluTracer, a detection framework that reads and aggregates truthfulness evidence across every layer of the forward pass before the model emits any answer token. A geometric analysis reveals that the per-layer signals are weakly correlated, so that simple depth averaging suppresses layer-specific noise and captures nearly all linearly accessible information. Across six open-source language models and five hallucination benchmarks, HalluTracer consistently outperforms matched white-box baselines, with gains ranging from one to fourteen points. Collectively, our work recasts hallucination detection from a layer-selection problem into a depth-aggregation problem governed by the geometric sparsity of the truthfulness signal.

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2608.16353 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2608.16353v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.16353 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 250 words

Related coverage