aiqbench analysis
This research introduces GuideFetch, a coordination framework enabling two assistive robot dogs to concurrently perform navigation and object retrieval tasks using Large Language Models for planning. The study validates that parallel execution significantly reduces mission completion time by 41.3% while maintaining high success rates through rigorous state checks that distinguish valid plans from actual task completion.
GuideFetch: A Task Coordination Framework for Concurrent Navigation and Object Retrieval in Assistive Robot Dogs
arXiv:2608.18292v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Consider a robot guide dog escorting a blind user to an available seat while a second assistive robot dog concurrently retrieves a cup of coffee and delivers it to the same seat. This setting motivates concurrent execution because navigation and object retrieval can overlap. A syntactically valid Large Language Model (LLM) plan may still violate embodiment constraints, and successful-looking controller motion does not by itself establish task completion. We introduce \textsc{GuideFetch}, a coordination framework for concurrent navigation and object retrieval by a heterogeneous guider and fetcher team. An LLM instantiates a schedule-conditioned four-action schema from a natural-language instruction. Before execution, robot, skill, and target aliases are normalized, and proposed actions are validated against registered targets, robot capabilities, and the selected schedule. Robot and object states then govern sequential and parallel execution. In a matched $2\times2$ study across 90 combinations of scene and seed (360 executions), all 180 online LLM responses validate without fallback or replay and match the corresponding scripted plans. For each planner source, sequential and parallel execution achieve $72/90$ and $71/90$ operational successes, respectively. Among the 56 cases completed by both schedules, parallel execution reduces mean makespan by 41.3\%. Within this controlled setting, role specialization and action overlap shorten completed missions, while state checks distinguish plan validity from verified mission completion. Source code will be available.
Abstract:Consider a robot guide dog escorting a blind user to an available seat while a second assistive robot dog concurrently retrieves a cup of coffee and delivers it to the same seat. This setting motivates concurrent execution because navigation and object retrieval can overlap. A syntactically valid Large Language Model (LLM) plan may still violate embodiment constraints, and successful-looking controller motion does not by itself establish task completion. We introduce \textsc{GuideFetch}, a coordination framework for concurrent navigation and object retrieval by a heterogeneous guider and fetcher team. An LLM instantiates a schedule-conditioned four-action schema from a natural-language instruction. Before execution, robot, skill, and target aliases are normalized, and proposed actions are validated against registered targets, robot capabilities, and the selected schedule. Robot and object states then govern sequential and parallel execution. In a matched $2\times2$ study across 90 combinations of scene and seed (360 executions), all 180 online LLM responses validate without fallback or replay and match the corresponding scripted plans. For each planner source, sequential and parallel execution achieve $72/90$ and $71/90$ operational successes, respectively. Among the 56 cases completed by both schedules, parallel execution reduces mean makespan by 41.3\%. Within this controlled setting, role specialization and action overlap shorten completed missions, while state checks distinguish plan validity from verified mission completion. Source code will be available.
Robotics (cs.RO); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
arXiv:2608.18292 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2608.18292v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.18292 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 317 words
Related coverage

Article: Multi-Agent AI for Production Security Operations: an A2A and MCP Architecture in a 5G Core
InfoQ · Jul 23, 2026
HarnessVLN: Unifying Training-Free Embodied Navigation through an Agent Harness
arXiv · Sep 15, 2026

NVIDIA Vera CPU: Olympus Cores Built for Maximum Single-Thread Performance in Agentic AI
NVIDIA · Jul 21, 2026

Intelligence is Free, Now What? <br> Data Systems for, of, and by Agents
BAIR Blog · Jul 7, 2026