aiqbench analysis
GUI-GenBench establishes a critical new benchmark for evaluating image generation models specifically as interactive GUI environments, distinguishing between mere visual plausibility and functional reliability in multi-step tasks. The study reveals that current models struggle with temporal consistency and accurate grounding when handling complex interaction logic, highlighting significant gaps before generated interfaces can serve as dependable systems. This research directly advances the field of generative AI by defining necessary metrics for future interactive applications.
GUI-GenBench: Evaluating Image Generation Models as Interactive GUI Environments
arXiv:2602.09007v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: An image generation model used as a graphical user interface (GUI) environment must produce not only a plausible screen but also the correct response to an action. Existing visual-generation benchmarks do not directly assess this combination of functional correctness and temporal consistency in GUIs. We introduce GUI-GenBench, a benchmark of 700 curated samples across five task suites: single-step transitions, multi-step planning, fictional-app generation, real-app trajectories, and coordinate-based grounding. We also introduce GUI-Score, a VLM-based metric that assesses Goal Achievement, Interaction Logic, Content Consistency, UI Plausibility, and Visual Quality. Evaluating 12 image generation models on Chinese and English subsets, we find that strong single-step performance does not consistently extend to coherent multi-step trajectories or accurate grounding. The highest aggregate GUI-Scores are 69.62 on the Chinese subset and 63.16 on the English subset. Qualitative analysis further identifies failures in text rendering, icon interpretation, and coordinate-conditioned transitions. Together, these results distinguish visual plausibility from functional reliability and identify limitations that must be addressed before generated GUIs can serve as dependable interaction environments.
Abstract:An image generation model used as a graphical user interface (GUI) environment must produce not only a plausible screen but also the correct response to an action. Existing visual-generation benchmarks do not directly assess this combination of functional correctness and temporal consistency in GUIs. We introduce GUI-GenBench, a benchmark of 700 curated samples across five task suites: single-step transitions, multi-step planning, fictional-app generation, real-app trajectories, and coordinate-based grounding. We also introduce GUI-Score, a VLM-based metric that assesses Goal Achievement, Interaction Logic, Content Consistency, UI Plausibility, and Visual Quality. Evaluating 12 image generation models on Chinese and English subsets, we find that strong single-step performance does not consistently extend to coherent multi-step trajectories or accurate grounding. The highest aggregate GUI-Scores are 69.62 on the Chinese subset and 63.16 on the English subset. Qualitative analysis further identifies failures in text rendering, icon interpretation, and coordinate-conditioned transitions. Together, these results distinguish visual plausibility from functional reliability and identify limitations that must be addressed before generated GUIs can serve as dependable interaction environments.
24 pages, 11 figures. Project page: this https URL
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
arXiv:2602.09007 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2602.09007v3 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.09007 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 276 words
Related coverage

Runway’s WorldPrompt and the Engineering of Real-Time Worlds
Latent Space · Sep 25, 2026

Frontier AI Risk Report (February–March 2026)
METR · May 19, 2026

Informe de riesgos de la IA de frontera (febrero–marzo de 2026)
METR · May 19, 2026

Frontier Risk Report (February to March 2026)
METR · May 19, 2026