aiqbench analysis
This research addresses a critical flaw in standard model stitching where functionally distinct models appear similar due to reliance on different information cues. By introducing invariance-aware stitching with forward-backward compatibility requirements, the study offers a more rigorous framework for evaluating functional similarity and uncovering hidden discrepancies. This advancement is significant for practitioners aiming to ensure robust model interoperability and accurate representation alignment in complex deep learning pipelines.
Grounding Functional Similarity by Invariance-Aware Model Stitching
arXiv:2505.20142v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: In deep learning, functional similarity evaluation quantifies the extent to which independently trained models learn similar input--output relationships. In model stitching, functional similarity is framed as representation forward compatibility, i.e., whether the representations of two models can be aligned to solve a given task. Recent studies, however, highlight a critical limitation: models relying on different information cues can still produce compatible representations, making them appear misleadingly similar (Smith et al., 2025). We attribute this failure to standard model stitching being inherently blind to the invariance properties of the stitched models. To address this limitation, we introduce the forward--backward compatibility requirement under which we formulate the invariance-aware model stitching. Through analyzing key stitching configurations, we study the interplay between forward and backward compatibility, showing that invariance-aware model stitching provides a more principled approach to functional similarity evaluation while revealing functional discrepancies previously obscured.
Abstract:In deep learning, functional similarity evaluation quantifies the extent to which independently trained models learn similar input--output relationships. In model stitching, functional similarity is framed as representation forward compatibility, i.e., whether the representations of two models can be aligned to solve a given task. Recent studies, however, highlight a critical limitation: models relying on different information cues can still produce compatible representations, making them appear misleadingly similar (Smith et al., 2025). We attribute this failure to standard model stitching being inherently blind to the invariance properties of the stitched models. To address this limitation, we introduce the forward--backward compatibility requirement under which we formulate the invariance-aware model stitching. Through analyzing key stitching configurations, we study the interplay between forward and backward compatibility, showing that invariance-aware model stitching provides a more principled approach to functional similarity evaluation while revealing functional discrepancies previously obscured.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2505.20142 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2505.20142v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.20142 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 234 words
Related coverage
Synthesis Superintelligence: from Semiconductors to Superconductors — Periodic Labs’ Liam Fedus and Ekin Dogus Cubuk
Latent Space · Oct 8, 2026

Presentation: Platform Teams Enabling AI - MCP/Multi-Agentic Tools across Linkedin
InfoQ · Jun 5, 2026
Metrics Failure in LLM-Based Code Vulnerability Repair: An Empirical Study and a Change-Aware Screen
arXiv · Sep 24, 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026