Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This article introduces GiT, a new dataset and benchmark specifically designed to evaluate how Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models utilize historical context for robotic manipulation tasks. By addressing the gap in history-dependent semantic inference across biolaboratory, household, and industrial scenarios, it provides critical infrastructure for advancing memory-augmented robotics research. The release highlights significant current limitations in end-to-end VLA models when required to make decisions based on prior events rather than just immediate observations.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Grounded in Time: A Multi-Source Dataset and Benchmark for Temporal Grounding in Robotic Manipulation

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.04255v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Robotic manipulation often requires inferring task-relevant states from past interactions when the current observation alone is insufficient to determine the appropriate action. Despite progress in benchmarking memory-augmented vision-language-action (VLA) models, application-oriented tasks requiring history-dependent semantic inference remain underrepresented. We introduce GiT (Grounded in Time), a dataset and benchmark for grounding manipulation decisions in past events across biolaboratory, household, and industrial scenarios. It includes real-robot and Universal Manipulation Interface (UMI) style demonstrations covering 18 bimanual tasks, together with simulation data and a ManiSkill-based evaluation suite covering nine tasks. Fine-grained subtask annotations and annotated counterfactual task pairs, in which similar current observations require different actions depending on prior events, support policy learning and targeted evaluation of history use. Evaluations of representative end-to-end VLA models in simulation and on selected real-world tasks reveal substantial room for improvement in history-dependent manipulation. The dataset and benchmark are available at the project page.

Abstract:Robotic manipulation often requires inferring task-relevant states from past interactions when the current observation alone is insufficient to determine the appropriate action. Despite progress in benchmarking memory-augmented vision-language-action (VLA) models, application-oriented tasks requiring history-dependent semantic inference remain underrepresented. We introduce GiT (Grounded in Time), a dataset and benchmark for grounding manipulation decisions in past events across biolaboratory, household, and industrial scenarios. It includes real-robot and Universal Manipulation Interface (UMI) style demonstrations covering 18 bimanual tasks, together with simulation data and a ManiSkill-based evaluation suite covering nine tasks. Fine-grained subtask annotations and annotated counterfactual task pairs, in which similar current observations require different actions depending on prior events, support policy learning and targeted evaluation of history use. Evaluations of representative end-to-end VLA models in simulation and on selected real-world tasks reveal substantial room for improvement in history-dependent manipulation. The dataset and benchmark are available at the project page.

Robotics (cs.RO); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

arXiv:2610.04255 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2610.04255v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.04255 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 246 words

Related coverage