aiqbench analysis
This research provides a rigorous statistical framework explaining how regularization geometry and signal sparsity influence the "grokking" phenomenon in high-dimensional regression. The authors prove that sparsity-promoting norms can significantly enhance generalization near interpolation, revealing a sharp instability where minor changes in regularization strength drastically alter model performance despite zero training error. These findings offer critical theoretical insights into the dynamics of delayed generalization and the limits of minimum-norm interpolation in overparameterized systems.
Grokking through the Lens of Minimum-Norm Interpolation
arXiv:2609.38453v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Grokking shows that fitting the training data and learning the underlying signal can occur at very different stages. However, existing theories offer limited quantitative insight into how this delayed generalization depends on inductive bias and signal structure. Our work addresses the gap by developing a statistical theory that characterizes how regularization geometry and signal sparsity govern generalization near interpolation. In particular, we focus on the prototypical setting of high-dimensional regression and identify regimes in which sparsity-promoting regularization makes exact interpolation much more accurate than approximate fitting. In strongly overparameterized noiseless problems, we prove a zero--one generalization law and construct a family of convex norms whose interpolators transition from the trivial risk of the all-zero predictor to exact recovery, while keeping the training error equal to $0$. Furthermore, when feature dimension and sample size are proportional, we provide a precise characterization of training and generalization errors along $\ell_r$-regularization paths. This in turn allows us to quantify the generalization gain that remains near interpolation: we show that this gain increases as the norm becomes more sparsity-promoting and as the target becomes sparser, with a sharp drop in generalization reached for noiseless data and $\ell_1$ regularization. Experiments on diagonal linear networks and transformers trained on modular arithmetic demonstrate the generality of our theoretical predictions. Finally, beyond grokking, our work reveals a statistical instability in minimum-norm interpolation: small perturbations in the regularization strength can lead to drastically different generalization, while preserving small training error.
Abstract:Grokking shows that fitting the training data and learning the underlying signal can occur at very different stages. However, existing theories offer limited quantitative insight into how this delayed generalization depends on inductive bias and signal structure. Our work addresses the gap by developing a statistical theory that characterizes how regularization geometry and signal sparsity govern generalization near interpolation. In particular, we focus on the prototypical setting of high-dimensional regression and identify regimes in which sparsity-promoting regularization makes exact interpolation much more accurate than approximate fitting. In strongly overparameterized noiseless problems, we prove a zero--one generalization law and construct a family of convex norms whose interpolators transition from the trivial risk of the all-zero predictor to exact recovery, while keeping the training error equal to $0$. Furthermore, when feature dimension and sample size are proportional, we provide a precise characterization of training and generalization errors along $\ell_r$-regularization paths. This in turn allows us to quantify the generalization gain that remains near interpolation: we show that this gain increases as the norm becomes more sparsity-promoting and as the target becomes sparser, with a sharp drop in generalization reached for noiseless data and $\ell_1$ regularization. Experiments on diagonal linear networks and transformers trained on modular arithmetic demonstrate the generality of our theoretical predictions. Finally, beyond grokking, our work reveals a statistical instability in minimum-norm interpolation: small perturbations in the regularization strength can lead to drastically different generalization, while preserving small training error.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Statistics Theory (math.ST); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
arXiv:2609.38453 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.38453v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.38453 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 340 words
Related coverage
Benign Overfitting for General Norms and Distributions
arXiv · Sep 30, 2026
Minimum Norm Interpolation via the Local Theory of Banach Spaces: The Role of $2$-Uniform Convexity
arXiv · Jul 27, 2026
Low-Rank Decay for Grokking in Scale-Invariant Transformers: A Spectral-Geometric View
arXiv · Jun 5, 2026
A Weighted Kernel Method for Approximation that Adapts to Learned Multivariable Structure
arXiv · Sep 16, 2026