Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

GRIP addresses the "query dominance" failure mode in retrieval-augmented generation by enforcing capacity asymmetry, forcing retrieved evidence to encode only residual information unavailable from the query itself. This architectural constraint significantly reduces hallucination rates and improves performance across five reasoning benchmarks while lowering mutual-information between queries and latent states. The approach offers a concrete method for enhancing grounding in large language models without relying on higher model capacities alone.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

GRIP: Grounded Reasoning via Information-Restricted Premises

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2608.16776v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: High-capacity encoders in retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) can let the query dominate the latent state, leaving retrieved evidence functionally irrelevant. We call this failure mode query dominance. To address it, we introduce \textbf{GRIP} (Grounded Reasoning via Information-Restricted Premises), which imposes capacity asymmetry: the decoder keeps full-dimensional access to the query, while retrieved evidence passes through a severe stochastic bottleneck. This forces the evidence channel to encode only the residual information unavailable from the query. Across five reasoning benchmarks, GRIP outperforms strong iterative baselines, cuts a query--latent mutual-information diagnostic by roughly 30$\times$ (14.8 $\to$ 0.47 bits), and reduces hallucination by 73\%. Residual-alignment analysis further shows that the bottleneck output occupies subspaces less aligned with the query than baseline representations.

Abstract:High-capacity encoders in retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) can let the query dominate the latent state, leaving retrieved evidence functionally irrelevant. We call this failure mode query dominance. To address it, we introduce \textbf{GRIP} (Grounded Reasoning via Information-Restricted Premises), which imposes capacity asymmetry: the decoder keeps full-dimensional access to the query, while retrieved evidence passes through a severe stochastic bottleneck. This forces the evidence channel to encode only the residual information unavailable from the query. Across five reasoning benchmarks, GRIP outperforms strong iterative baselines, cuts a query--latent mutual-information diagnostic by roughly 30$\times$ (14.8 $\to$ 0.47 bits), and reduces hallucination by 73\%. Residual-alignment analysis further shows that the bottleneck output occupies subspaces less aligned with the query than baseline representations.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2608.16776 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2608.16776v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.16776 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 211 words

Related coverage