aiqbench analysis
This paper introduces Grid-Bench, an executable benchmark that tests whether LLMs can track spatial state changes through sequences of operations on 2D, 3D, and 4D grids. Its main finding is that exact-match accuracy drops sharply as event histories lengthen, and models with similar exact-match scores can still differ a lot in how many cells they get wrong. Because every predicted cell is checked against reference execution, the benchmark gives a finer-grained measure of model reliability than final-answer accuracy alone.
Grid-Bench: Can LLMs Predict How Discrete Worlds Change?
arXiv:2610.22312v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Spatial instructions describe how to move objects, transform regions, or modify their surroundings. When several operations are applied in sequence, each acts on a configuration shaped by earlier changes. How accurately can large language models (LLMs) predict the resulting spatial state? We introduce Grid-Bench, an executable benchmark in which eight families of operations transform discrete worlds represented as two-, three-, and four-dimensional grids. Given an initial grid, explicit rules, and an event history expressed as text, a model predicts the complete final grid. Reference execution makes every predicted value checkable, supporting comparisons across spatial operations, history lengths, and workloads. Evaluating six LLMs shows that complete-state accuracy falls sharply as histories grow, with substantial divergence among models that perform similarly on single events. Models with similar exact-match accuracy can nevertheless differ substantially in the number of incorrect cells on shared instances. Even over long histories, some models recover many correct changes beyond what copying the initial state would yield. Grid-Bench makes both complete recovery and these differences in returned states directly measurable across a range of spatial conditions.
Title:Grid-Bench: Can LLMs Predict How Discrete Worlds Change?
Abstract:Spatial instructions describe how to move objects, transform regions, or modify their surroundings. When several operations are applied in sequence, each acts on a configuration shaped by earlier changes. How accurately can large language models (LLMs) predict the resulting spatial state? We introduce Grid-Bench, an executable benchmark in which eight families of operations transform discrete worlds represented as two-, three-, and four-dimensional grids. Given an initial grid, explicit rules, and an event history expressed as text, a model predicts the complete final grid. Reference execution makes every predicted value checkable, supporting comparisons across spatial operations, history lengths, and workloads. Evaluating six LLMs shows that complete-state accuracy falls sharply as histories grow, with substantial divergence among models that perform similarly on single events. Models with similar exact-match accuracy can nevertheless differ substantially in the number of incorrect cells on shared instances. Even over long histories, some models recover many correct changes beyond what copying the initial state would yield. Grid-Bench makes both complete recovery and these differences in returned states directly measurable across a range of spatial conditions.
39 pages, 15 figures, 15 tables, including appendices. Project website: this https URL ; Code: this https URL ; Data: this https URL
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2610.22312 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2610.22312v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.22312 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 303 words
Related coverage

[AINews] Meta Muse Wonder & Wonder Full: MSL’s Claude 5.5-tier Frontier Model
Latent Space · Oct 13, 2026

Game Design Creativity evals
LessWrong · Oct 12, 2026

Dharma vs Adharma - The Perplexity of Being Alive
hillpost.in · Aug 25, 2026
Untrusted advice for AI control: Short, strong advice significantly uplifts weak LLMs
LessWrong · Jul 27, 2026