aiqbench analysis
GRASP addresses a critical reliability gap in LLM agents by enforcing hard regression budgets during self-improvement, preventing new skills from silently degrading previously correct behaviors. The method treats agent evolution as curated edits to a bounded skill library rather than unvalidated accumulation of natural language guidance, significantly boosting performance on structured clinical benchmarks without relying solely on the base model's inherent capabilities. This approach isolates procedural reliability gains specifically to its gating mechanism and validation framework, offering a robust path forward for deploying agents in environments requiring consistent operational accuracy.
GRASP: Gated Regression-Aware Skill Proposer for Self-Improving LLM Agents
arXiv:2605.29668v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: LLM agents acting in structured environments fail in operational rather than conversational ways, and reliability depends on procedural knowledge of the environment. Prior self-improvement methods accumulate natural-language guidance without checking that each new item preserves previously correct behavior, so a note that fixes one trajectory can silently regress another. We introduce GRASP (Gated Regression-Aware Skill Proposer), which treats agent improvement as a sequence of edits to a bounded skill library, admitting each candidate only if it produces a net improvement on a balanced held-out probe under a hard regression budget. We evaluate GRASP across five base models on two FHIR-based clinical benchmarks, which score procedural reliability against FHIR state rather than clinical correctness or patient outcomes. On MedAgentBench, GRASP lifts gpt-oss-120b from 40.6% to 88.8%, exceeds the strongest of five self-improvement baselines by 21.0 points, and improves every other base model by 17.2 to 40.3 points. Ablations attribute the gain to comparative proposal generation, the acceptance gate, and the hard regression budget rather than to skill writing itself, which without validation is no better than using no skills. Granting the same acceptance gate to all five baselines lifts each of them in-domain and none of them out of distribution, isolating the gain to the gate applied to a bounded, editable library rather than to held-out validation itself. The mechanism helps in non-clinical environments where tasks recur with verifiable structure and is flat where the action space is open-ended. Frozen libraries transfer across models and across benchmarks that share a tool-calling convention and degrade under interface mismatch.
Abstract:LLM agents acting in structured environments fail in operational rather than conversational ways, and reliability depends on procedural knowledge of the environment. Prior self-improvement methods accumulate natural-language guidance without checking that each new item preserves previously correct behavior, so a note that fixes one trajectory can silently regress another. We introduce GRASP (Gated Regression-Aware Skill Proposer), which treats agent improvement as a sequence of edits to a bounded skill library, admitting each candidate only if it produces a net improvement on a balanced held-out probe under a hard regression budget. We evaluate GRASP across five base models on two FHIR-based clinical benchmarks, which score procedural reliability against FHIR state rather than clinical correctness or patient outcomes. On MedAgentBench, GRASP lifts gpt-oss-120b from 40.6% to 88.8%, exceeds the strongest of five self-improvement baselines by 21.0 points, and improves every other base model by 17.2 to 40.3 points. Ablations attribute the gain to comparative proposal generation, the acceptance gate, and the hard regression budget rather than to skill writing itself, which without validation is no better than using no skills. Granting the same acceptance gate to all five baselines lifts each of them in-domain and none of them out of distribution, isolating the gain to the gate applied to a bounded, editable library rather than to held-out validation itself. The mechanism helps in non-clinical environments where tasks recur with verifiable structure and is flat where the action space is open-ended. Frozen libraries transfer across models and across benchmarks that share a tool-calling convention and degrade under interface mismatch.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2605.29668 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2605.29668v2 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.29668 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 352 words
Related coverage
Research Note: Filtering Subversion-Relevant Information From Pretraining Data Is Feasible
LessWrong · Oct 5, 2026
SAGE: A Statistical Acceptance Gate for Self-Evolving Agents
arXiv · Sep 30, 2026
[AINews] Reality Checks on AI News (Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks’ +60% Astra cost)
Latent Space · Sep 17, 2026
Dharma vs Adharma - The Perplexity of Being Alive
hillpost.in · Aug 25, 2026