aiqbench analysis
GraphIR introduces a specialized intermediate representation designed to bridge the gap between executable neural programs and Large Language Model-guided architecture search. By explicitly structuring candidate networks into computation skeletons, mutation surfaces, and validity envelopes, this method significantly improves dependency tracking and reduces failure risks during automated design evolution. The approach demonstrates superior performance across multiple benchmarks while maintaining efficiency comparable to existing solutions when integrated with frameworks like OpenEvolve.
GraphIR: Architecture-Level Search States for LLM-Guided Neural Architecture Evolution
arXiv:2608.01633v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) enable neural architecture search (NAS) directly over executable neural network programs. However, code-level flexibility does not provide the architecture state needed for effective mutation: LLMs must infer tensor dependencies, editable components, and compatibility constraints from implementation details. To address this representation mismatch, we propose GraphIR, an architecture-aware intermediate representation that supplements executable programs with a mutation-aligned candidate state. GraphIR organizes each candidate through three complementary views: a computation skeleton describing tensor flow, a mutation surface exposing editable modules and operations, and a validity envelope capturing interface contracts, propagated shapes, and downstream dependencies. To evaluate our method, we construct NAS-Dependency, a 120-question benchmark covering six complementary dependency-reasoning dimensions. The diagnostic shows that GraphIR is particularly effective at identifying exact producer occurrences, tracing dependency propagation, and diagnosing interface and failure risks. Across six downstream benchmarks including CLRS, GraphIR achieves the best overall search performance while maintaining comparable model size and favorable end-to-end NAS efficiency when integrated into OpenEvolve. These results show that a mutation-oriented architecture state provides an effective interface between executable neural programs and LLM-guided architecture evolution.
Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) enable neural architecture search (NAS) directly over executable neural network programs. However, code-level flexibility does not provide the architecture state needed for effective mutation: LLMs must infer tensor dependencies, editable components, and compatibility constraints from implementation details. To address this representation mismatch, we propose GraphIR, an architecture-aware intermediate representation that supplements executable programs with a mutation-aligned candidate state. GraphIR organizes each candidate through three complementary views: a computation skeleton describing tensor flow, a mutation surface exposing editable modules and operations, and a validity envelope capturing interface contracts, propagated shapes, and downstream dependencies. To evaluate our method, we construct NAS-Dependency, a 120-question benchmark covering six complementary dependency-reasoning dimensions. The diagnostic shows that GraphIR is particularly effective at identifying exact producer occurrences, tracing dependency propagation, and diagnosing interface and failure risks. Across six downstream benchmarks including CLRS, GraphIR achieves the best overall search performance while maintaining comparable model size and favorable end-to-end NAS efficiency when integrated into OpenEvolve. These results show that a mutation-oriented architecture state provides an effective interface between executable neural programs and LLM-guided architecture evolution.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2608.01633 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2608.01633v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.01633 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 274 words
Related coverage
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · Sep 18, 2026

Humanity’s Last Invention — Richard Socher of Recursive
Latent Space · Sep 14, 2026

PIRAMID: Progress and Plans
LessWrong · Jul 27, 2026
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · Jul 31, 2026