aiqbench analysis
This research introduces "graph-to-grid" feature painting, a technique that interpolates continuous player coordinates onto a grid to improve the accuracy of soccer pass surface prediction models. By training encoders end-to-end with this scattered bilinear interpolation, the method achieves a measurable gain in selection likelihood compared to traditional raster-based inputs alone. The study provides rigorous empirical evidence on how fine-grained spatial representations enhance performance in computer vision tasks for sports analytics without relying on hypothetical pass evaluations.
Graph-to-Grid (G2G): Continuous-Coordinate Feature Painting for Soccer Pass Surfaces
arXiv:2609.24040v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Dense pass surfaces give, for every pitch cell, whether a pass played there would arrive, whether the carrier would choose it, and what the possession would then be worth. The networks that draw them read the state as a raster of per-cell counts, losing where inside a cell each player stands. LiDAR detectors, bird's-eye-view perception and graph weather models move entity features onto a grid, binning each entity to a cell or learning the transfer. We evaluate the interpolated form: each player's features are scattered bilinearly onto the grid at the player's measured coordinates, so the surface loss trains the per-player encoder end to end. Those systems adopt an interface; this paper measures one. On 53,628 passes from the 2022 World Cup, painting improves selection likelihood over the same core fed rasters alone by about a quarter of a nat: in every match of an eight-fold cross-validation, with every arm tuned over five seeds, and after retraining on seven Bundesliga and 2. Bundesliga matches from another provider. Thirteen pre-specified studies locate the gain: painting the nine raw player features with no encoder carries three quarters of it, and the learned encoder and message passing add a smaller, resolved increment. Painting also helps the original SoccerMap and a canonical U-Net, whereas offset channels, a finer raster, an attention painter and a raster-free decoder do not. Frozen across the provider boundary the likelihood advantage is lost; injected tracking error compresses it. These results concern observed-endpoint prediction, not calibrated evaluation of hypothetical passes.
Abstract:Dense pass surfaces give, for every pitch cell, whether a pass played there would arrive, whether the carrier would choose it, and what the possession would then be worth. The networks that draw them read the state as a raster of per-cell counts, losing where inside a cell each player stands. LiDAR detectors, bird's-eye-view perception and graph weather models move entity features onto a grid, binning each entity to a cell or learning the transfer. We evaluate the interpolated form: each player's features are scattered bilinearly onto the grid at the player's measured coordinates, so the surface loss trains the per-player encoder end to end. Those systems adopt an interface; this paper measures one. On 53,628 passes from the 2022 World Cup, painting improves selection likelihood over the same core fed rasters alone by about a quarter of a nat: in every match of an eight-fold cross-validation, with every arm tuned over five seeds, and after retraining on seven Bundesliga and 2. Bundesliga matches from another provider. Thirteen pre-specified studies locate the gain: painting the nine raw player features with no encoder carries three quarters of it, and the learned encoder and message passing add a smaller, resolved increment. Painting also helps the original SoccerMap and a canonical U-Net, whereas offset channels, a finer raster, an attention painter and a raster-free decoder do not. Frozen across the provider boundary the likelihood advantage is lost; injected tracking error compresses it. These results concern observed-endpoint prediction, not calibrated evaluation of hypothetical passes.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
arXiv:2609.24040 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.24040v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.24040 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 350 words
