Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research investigates integrating graph neural networks with classical heuristic methods like the energetic cavity method to solve combinatorial optimization problems framed as Ising models. The study concludes that while modified GNNs can compete with other deep learning approaches, traditional simulated annealing remains at least as effective for the same computational cost.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Graph neural networks and the energetic cavity method for combinatorial optimization

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.07456v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study the use of graph neural networks (GNNs) for finding approximate ground states of Ising models. Efficiently finding these ground states is of broad significance because many combinatorial optimization problems can be formulated as an Ising model with the appropriate choice of couplings and fields. Exactly solving these problems is hard but there are many good heuristic methods. A lineage of these heuristics build from mean-field approximations: one approach uses the leading eigenvector of an appropriately defined matrix, another is the min-sum algorithm, also known as the energetic cavity method. Without modification, GNNs perform worse than both of these methods. We consider small modifications to the GNN to incorporate these heuristics and find that this considerably improves performance. While the modified approach is competitive against other deep-learning approaches, we still find that simulated annealing is reliably at least as good as deep learning methods for the same computational cost.

Abstract:We study the use of graph neural networks (GNNs) for finding approximate ground states of Ising models. Efficiently finding these ground states is of broad significance because many combinatorial optimization problems can be formulated as an Ising model with the appropriate choice of couplings and fields. Exactly solving these problems is hard but there are many good heuristic methods. A lineage of these heuristics build from mean-field approximations: one approach uses the leading eigenvector of an appropriately defined matrix, another is the min-sum algorithm, also known as the energetic cavity method. Without modification, GNNs perform worse than both of these methods. We consider small modifications to the GNN to incorporate these heuristics and find that this considerably improves performance. While the modified approach is competitive against other deep-learning approaches, we still find that simulated annealing is reliably at least as good as deep learning methods for the same computational cost.

Disordered Systems and Neural Networks (cond-mat.dis-nn); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2609.07456 [cond-mat.dis-nn]

(or arXiv:2609.07456v1 [cond-mat.dis-nn] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.07456 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 250 words

Related coverage