Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces an amortized approach using Gromov-Wasserstein optimal transport to efficiently solve the graph-matching bottleneck in end-to-end supervised graph prediction. By jointly learning a parametric matcher with the prediction module, the method avoids costly inner optimizations while handling arbitrary node orderings. The technique demonstrates significant efficiency gains on complex tasks, including a novel mass-spectra analysis application.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Graph Matching Relaxations and Amortization for Supervised Graph Prediction

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.15437v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: End-to-end Supervised Graph Prediction (SGP) requires a permutation-invariant loss to compare predicted and target graphs with arbitrary node orderings. Such losses typically involve a costly graph-matching problem. We first study three Optimal Transport relaxations of this problem and show, theoretically and empirically, that the Gromov-Wasserstein (GW) objective is the most suitable for SGP. Then, to avoid solving the resulting inner optimization for every training example, we propose to amortize the graph matching (node alignment) problem. For each training sample, the loss function leverages a transport plan provided by a parametric matcher based on the differentiable Sinkhorn algorithm applied on empirical node distributions. The graph prediction module and the matcher are jointly learned. We showcase the efficiency of this approach on toy and real world SGP problems of increasing complexity including a novel Mass-spectra to Scaffold task that we introduce.

Abstract:End-to-end Supervised Graph Prediction (SGP) requires a permutation-invariant loss to compare predicted and target graphs with arbitrary node orderings. Such losses typically involve a costly graph-matching problem. We first study three Optimal Transport relaxations of this problem and show, theoretically and empirically, that the Gromov-Wasserstein (GW) objective is the most suitable for SGP. Then, to avoid solving the resulting inner optimization for every training example, we propose to amortize the graph matching (node alignment) problem. For each training sample, the loss function leverages a transport plan provided by a parametric matcher based on the differentiable Sinkhorn algorithm applied on empirical node distributions. The graph prediction module and the matcher are jointly learned. We showcase the efficiency of this approach on toy and real world SGP problems of increasing complexity including a novel Mass-spectra to Scaffold task that we introduce.

Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2609.15437 [stat.ML]

(or arXiv:2609.15437v1 [stat.ML] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.15437 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 236 words

Related coverage