aiqbench analysis
This research addresses a key limitation in dense vector retrieval by demonstrating how offline graph-modified embeddings can recover evidence connected through intermediate entities without requiring real-time graph access. The study finds that multi-stage strategies combining these modified embeddings with original vectors significantly improve fact-recovery rates and reduce node overhead compared to standard methods.
Graph-free Retrieval with Graph-Modified Embeddings
arXiv:2610.18410v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Dense vector retrieval can miss evidence connected through intermediate entities, while direct graph retrieval requires access to the graph at query time. We compare five offline graph-based embedding transformations and strategies for using the resulting graph-modified embeddings alongside the originals, without query-time graph access. On a synthetic professional-network benchmark with complete supporting-evidence sets, direct replacement of the original embeddings reduces evidence recovery. Multi-stage strategies improve recovery by using graph-modified embeddings to guide the search while retaining the originals for semantic relevance. On questions requiring linked facts or comparisons among candidates, the strongest configuration improves recovery by up to 25.9% relative to plain vector retrieval. It also matches baseline recovery with 40% fewer returned nodes. Controls confirm that graph information contributes beyond multi-stage retrieval alone. Across the tested methods, retrieval performance depends more on how graph-modified embeddings are used than on how they are produced.
Abstract:Dense vector retrieval can miss evidence connected through intermediate entities, while direct graph retrieval requires access to the graph at query time. We compare five offline graph-based embedding transformations and strategies for using the resulting graph-modified embeddings alongside the originals, without query-time graph access. On a synthetic professional-network benchmark with complete supporting-evidence sets, direct replacement of the original embeddings reduces evidence recovery. Multi-stage strategies improve recovery by using graph-modified embeddings to guide the search while retaining the originals for semantic relevance. On questions requiring linked facts or comparisons among candidates, the strongest configuration improves recovery by up to 25.9% relative to plain vector retrieval. It also matches baseline recovery with 40% fewer returned nodes. Controls confirm that graph information contributes beyond multi-stage retrieval alone. Across the tested methods, retrieval performance depends more on how graph-modified embeddings are used than on how they are produced.
Information Retrieval (cs.IR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.18410 [cs.IR]
(or arXiv:2610.18410v1 [cs.IR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.18410 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 241 words
Related coverage

Scaling Karpathy’s LLM wiki: Why your knowledge base needs a graph
Neo4j · Aug 31, 2026

Glyph: A Multi-Strategy Agentic System for Column Description and Sensitivity-Ontology Tagging of Enterprise Data Catalogs
Apple · Sep 16, 2026
Comparative Approaches to Agent Retrieval over Large Skill Libraries
arXiv · Aug 7, 2026

The payload: the semantic layer, memory, and the loop that fills it
Neo4j · Aug 10, 2026