Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This paper introduces a graph-based heuristic for the Minimum Constraint Removal problem, enabling humanoid robots to navigate cluttered environments by identifying movable obstacles rather than treating them as fixed barriers. The proposed pipeline achieves significant speedups over exact search methods while maintaining solution quality within acceptable bounds for real-time applications. This advancement directly addresses computational bottlenecks in motion planning among dynamic objects, a core challenge in advanced robotics and AI-driven automation.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Graph-Based Heuristics for Minimum Constraint Removal in Cluttered Robot Motion Planning

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2610.12609v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Humanoid and service robots operating in clut- tered human environments may encounter motion planning problems that are infeasible when all surrounding objects are treated as fixed obstacles. The Minimum Constraint Removal problem, which we refer to as MCR, addresses this situation by identifying the minimum number of constraints, such as movable objects, whose removal enables a collision-free path. However, computing an optimal MCR solution is NP-hard. In this work, we propose a graph-based heuristic pipeline that combines bidirectional feasible-set generation with fixed- length searches over reduced MCR graphs. We further derive an extended feasible-set generator for instances in which the candidates produced by the first generator do not contain a complete optimal removal set. Across six benchmarks, the evaluated pipeline matches the exact solution in three cases and, in the remaining cases, selects at most 31.25% more obstacles than the optimum, while being between 3.4 and 33.7 times faster than exact search. In one of the benchmarks, involving a manipulation task amidst clutter, selecting two rather than seven obstructing objects reduces the combined MCR, inverse- kinematics, and motion planning time from 84.72 s to 30.59 s. These results indicate that the proposed approach provides a practical compromise between computational efficiency and solution quality for motion planning among movable obstacles.

Abstract:Humanoid and service robots operating in clut- tered human environments may encounter motion planning problems that are infeasible when all surrounding objects are treated as fixed obstacles. The Minimum Constraint Removal problem, which we refer to as MCR, addresses this situation by identifying the minimum number of constraints, such as movable objects, whose removal enables a collision-free path. However, computing an optimal MCR solution is NP-hard. In this work, we propose a graph-based heuristic pipeline that combines bidirectional feasible-set generation with fixed- length searches over reduced MCR graphs. We further derive an extended feasible-set generator for instances in which the candidates produced by the first generator do not contain a complete optimal removal set. Across six benchmarks, the evaluated pipeline matches the exact solution in three cases and, in the remaining cases, selects at most 31.25% more obstacles than the optimum, while being between 3.4 and 33.7 times faster than exact search. In one of the benchmarks, involving a manipulation task amidst clutter, selecting two rather than seven obstructing objects reduces the combined MCR, inverse- kinematics, and motion planning time from 84.72 s to 30.59 s. These results indicate that the proposed approach provides a practical compromise between computational efficiency and solution quality for motion planning among movable obstacles.

Robotics (cs.RO)

arXiv:2610.12609 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2610.12609v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.12609 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 302 words

Related coverage