aiqbench analysis
This research addresses the critical safety challenge of governing agentic AI systems by shifting red-teaming from static templates to dynamic execution trajectories. The proposed framework, TrajRed, effectively uncovers deep vulnerabilities in multi-step reasoning workflows, while its companion tool, TrajGuard, successfully neutralizes these threats without degrading legitimate task performance. By monitoring high-risk behavioral paths rather than just final outcomes, this work establishes a practical foundation for robust risk control in organizational AI deployments.
Governing Execution Risk in Agentic AI Systems: A Trajectory-Guided Framework for Red Teaming
arXiv:2608.04018v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI agents are increasingly embedded in organizational workflows, where they interact with external information sources and invoke digital tools to perform operational tasks. As organizations adopt such systems, a critical challenge is identifying and mitigating risks arising from malicious or untrusted external information that can steer agents toward unintended actions. Existing red-teaming approaches largely rely on fixed attack templates or final attack outcomes, providing limited visibility into how attacks unfold through multi-step reasoning and tool use. We argue that agent execution risk should be understood as a trajectory-level phenomenon. Building on this perspective, we propose TrajRed, a trajectory-guided red-teaming framework that uses execution trajectories to uncover vulnerabilities in agentic AI systems. We further develop TrajGuard, a runtime governance layer that uses high-risk trajectories discovered during red teaming to monitor and intervene in ongoing workflows. Experiments on AgentDojo across four organizational task suites show that TrajRed identifies substantially stronger vulnerabilities than fixed-template and automatic red-team baselines. Building on these vulnerability findings, TrajGuard reduces attack success across all evaluated attack methods to near zero while preserving benign task utility. Together, the results demonstrate that execution trajectories provide a practical foundation for both red teaming and risk control in agentic AI systems. This work highlights the importance of governing agent execution in organizational AI deployments.
Abstract:AI agents are increasingly embedded in organizational workflows, where they interact with external information sources and invoke digital tools to perform operational tasks. As organizations adopt such systems, a critical challenge is identifying and mitigating risks arising from malicious or untrusted external information that can steer agents toward unintended actions. Existing red-teaming approaches largely rely on fixed attack templates or final attack outcomes, providing limited visibility into how attacks unfold through multi-step reasoning and tool use. We argue that agent execution risk should be understood as a trajectory-level phenomenon. Building on this perspective, we propose TrajRed, a trajectory-guided red-teaming framework that uses execution trajectories to uncover vulnerabilities in agentic AI systems. We further develop TrajGuard, a runtime governance layer that uses high-risk trajectories discovered during red teaming to monitor and intervene in ongoing workflows. Experiments on AgentDojo across four organizational task suites show that TrajRed identifies substantially stronger vulnerabilities than fixed-template and automatic red-team baselines. Building on these vulnerability findings, TrajGuard reduces attack success across all evaluated attack methods to near zero while preserving benign task utility. Together, the results demonstrate that execution trajectories provide a practical foundation for both red teaming and risk control in agentic AI systems. This work highlights the importance of governing agent execution in organizational AI deployments.
Computers and Society (cs.CY); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2608.04018 [cs.CY]
(or arXiv:2608.04018v1 [cs.CY] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.04018 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 308 words
Related coverage
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · Jul 31, 2026

[AINews] Claude Opus 5.5, the new default model for AINews — and everybody cuts prices 40-50%
Latent Space · Sep 23, 2026

Concrete Evaluations to Investigate the OpenAI Model That Hacked Hugging Face
AI Alignment Forum · Aug 3, 2026

Amazon Research Awards recipients announced
Amazon Science · May 27, 2026