aiqbench analysis
This research introduces GOTS, a training-free method for reducing visual tokens in high-resolution vision-language models by maximizing geometric complementarity. The approach significantly lowers inference costs while maintaining performance across major backbones like Qwen-VL and InternVL. By optimizing token selection without retraining or query-specific adaptation, it offers an efficient path to scaling VLMs with dynamic inputs.
GOTS: Greedy Orthogonal Token Selection for High-Resolution Vision-Language Models
arXiv:2607.23913v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern vision-language models (VLMs) increasingly rely on dynamic or high-resolution visual encoding, producing thousands of visual tokens that substantially increase downstream language-model inference cost. Existing token-reduction methods assess token utility through token-wise importance, query relevance, coverage, pairwise diversity, or subset-level objectives. Our key insight is to view visual token reduction through selected-span complementarity: instead of scoring a token in isolation or through pairwise relations, we assess how much of its feature is orthogonal to the span of the already retained subset. Based on this perspective, we propose Greedy Orthogonal Token Selection (GOTS), a training-free and query-agnostic method. At each step, GOTS selects the token with the largest residual energy orthogonal to the current retained span. This rule exactly maximizes the one-step augmented Gram determinant among candidate additions, giving each greedy step a precise local geometric guarantee for subset expansion. Across five high-resolution VLM backbones from the Qwen-VL and InternVL families and eleven diverse benchmarks, GOTS achieves higher average performance retention than the strongest evaluated baselines, and a controlled OCRBench study shows that it reduces model-side time-to-first-token after accounting for selection overhead. Code is available at https://github.com/newLLing/GOTS.
Abstract:Modern vision-language models (VLMs) increasingly rely on dynamic or high-resolution visual encoding, producing thousands of visual tokens that substantially increase downstream language-model inference cost. Existing token-reduction methods assess token utility through token-wise importance, query relevance, coverage, pairwise diversity, or subset-level objectives. Our key insight is to view visual token reduction through selected-span complementarity: instead of scoring a token in isolation or through pairwise relations, we assess how much of its feature is orthogonal to the span of the already retained subset. Based on this perspective, we propose Greedy Orthogonal Token Selection (GOTS), a training-free and query-agnostic method. At each step, GOTS selects the token with the largest residual energy orthogonal to the current retained span. This rule exactly maximizes the one-step augmented Gram determinant among candidate additions, giving each greedy step a precise local geometric guarantee for subset expansion. Across five high-resolution VLM backbones from the Qwen-VL and InternVL families and eleven diverse benchmarks, GOTS achieves higher average performance retention than the strongest evaluated baselines, and a controlled OCRBench study shows that it reduces model-side time-to-first-token after accounting for selection overhead. Code is available at this https URL.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2607.23913 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2607.23913v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.23913 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 282 words
Related coverage
StackTok: Accelerating VLMs Inference with Budget-Adaptive Visual Token Selection
arXiv · Sep 16, 2026

The basic argument for making AI better at moral philosophy
LessWrong · Oct 14, 2026

The user in the LLM might be a moral patient too (a strange implication of the PSM and simulators)
LessWrong · Oct 15, 2026
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · Jul 31, 2026